Teams

EHTC:Powershots:Blair/Emhoff

2021 NCT Adult 18 & Over Women · 4.0 Women

17 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 DoublesCarol Halliday / Kristen Gourley vs Lisa Schadler Alessio / Jennifer Moffa6-0, 6-2
W#1 SinglesStacy Collins vs Suzanne Quaintance6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesVirginia Blair / Susan Emhoff vs Diane Honig / Christine Burns6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesAlessandra Veronesi vs Kate Green6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesBarbara Clarke / Jaybel Yazon vs Trudy Pearce / Elizabeth Crabtree6-4, 6-0
W#1 DoublesKristen Gourley / Esther McNany vs Jennifer Mazzocca / Lisa Schadler Alessio6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesIkumi Kayama vs Jenni Bourque7-6, 2-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCarol Halliday / Denise Toce vs Diane Honig / Christine Burns6-1, 7-6
W#2 SinglesStacy Collins vs Gail Granger6-3, 6-1
2021-03-27vs NTC:Double Shots:Page/SiebertWon 40
W#1 DoublesEsther McNany / Susan Emhoff vs Vanessa Vitale / Coleen McCarthy6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesAlessandra Veronesi vs Ashley Kalman6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesGwen Marrion / Carol Halliday vs Nancy Inglese / Lynn Siebert6-4, 6-0
W#2 SinglesIkumi Kayama vs Corinne Ross6-3, 6-1
2021-03-13vs FV:Wild Cards:Fishman/AronsonWon 32
L#1 DoublesKristen Gourley / Gwen Marrion vs Liz Stockwell / Jean Robbins6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAlessandra Veronesi vs Esther Aronson3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesEsther McNany / Kerry Shaheen vs Laurie Sansone / Ewa Stasiowska1-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesStacy Collins vs Melanie Bowers6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesNancy Bray / Virginia Blair vs Cheryl Glasgow / Ann Marie Schumsky7-5, 6-2
2021-03-06vs FV:Fearhands:Goodwin/KingWon 32
W#1 DoublesEsther McNany / Susan Emhoff vs Amy Branch / Sheri Eklund6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesAlessandra Veronesi vs Veronica Badiola6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDenise Toce / Jaybel Yazon vs Shea Kinney / Megan Mayo4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 SinglesStacey Weinstein vs Stacy Millman7-5, 6-0
W#3 DoublesCarol Halliday / Kristen Gourley vs Cari Anne Goodwin / Jennifer King6-1, 7-5
2021-02-27vs NTC:Double Shots:Page/SiebertWon 41
W#1 DoublesGwen Marrion / Stacey Weinstein vs Kirsten Page / Melissa Barra6-1, 7-5
W#1 SinglesStacy Collins vs Ashley Kalman6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKerry Shaheen / Esther McNany vs Coleen McCarthy / Lynn Siebert6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesSusan Emhoff vs Bianka Horvath6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBarbara Clarke / Jaybel Yazon vs Zoe Dolan / Leslie Palumbo6-3, 7-6
2020-10-31vs FV:Fearhands:Goodwin/KingLost 23
W#1 DoublesKristen Gourley / Carol Norman vs Valerie Sorensen / Cari Anne Goodwin6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAlessandra Veronesi vs Veronica Badiola2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesGwen Marrion / Virginia Blair vs Sheri Eklund / Michele Cook6-3, 6-0
L#2 SinglesStacy Collins vs Katharine Miller6-4, 1-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesEsther McNany / Mary Varley vs Shea Kinney / Jennifer Grant4-6, 2-6
2020-10-17vs FV:Wild Cards:Fishman/AronsonWon 32
W#1 DoublesKristen Gourley / Carol Norman vs Carolyn McGarr-Lee / Jean Robbins6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesAlessandra Veronesi vs Uma Mehta6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesGwen Marrion / Kerry Shaheen vs Rebecca Fishman / Marianne Berman6-3, 6-1
L#2 SinglesSusan Emhoff vs Ewa Stasiowska6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLouise Sterling / Denise Toce vs Lori Swenson / Martha Guidry2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · 4.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1RH:Love This:Ingalls000000
2SIMS:Sweet Shots:Chapel/Kaplan06171335293
3BSF:Kick Aces:Murnane/Mutarelli06141637285
4EHTC:Powershots:Blair/Emhoff08301024246
5FV:Wild Cards:Fishman/Aronson08241637314
6FV:Fearhands:Goodwin/King08221847374
7NTC:Double Shots:Page/Siebert08142658398
8FV:Perfect Match:Schadler-Alessio/Peabody08103065410

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.03
Alessandra Veronesi
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 4.5
3.82
Virginia Blair
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.79
Stacey Weinstein
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.76
Kristen Gourley
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Ikumi Kayama
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.71
Esther McNany
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.71
Carol Halliday
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.70
Gwen Marrion
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.69
Stacy Collins
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
3.63
Kerry Shaheen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.54
Denise Toce
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.22
Barbara Clarke
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Nancy Bray
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
Louise Sterling
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.04
Mary Varley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jaybel Yazon
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Susan Emhoff
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stacey Weinstein + Jaybel Yazon5263% games+10.3% vs expected
Kerry Shaheen + Kristen Gourley5559% games+7.2% vs expected
Gwen Marrion + Susan Emhoff12259% games+4.7% vs expected
Gwen Marrion + Denise Toce281554% games+2.5% vs expected
Stacey Weinstein + Virginia Blair7658% games+1.4% vs expected
Jaybel Yazon + Barbara Clarke4160% games+0.5% vs expected
Esther McNany + Kristen Gourley10856% games−1.7% vs expected
Alessandra Veronesi + Stacy Collins5150% games−1.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Alessandra Veronesi
85W–36L career · 6 lines in 2021
41%59%<1%
4.03
Virginia Blair
109W–73L career · 3 lines in 2021
1%91%8%
3.82
Stacey Weinstein
93W–55L career · 2 lines in 2021
1%93%5%
3.79
Kristen Gourley
55W–44L career · 6 lines in 2021
2%95%3%
3.76
4
Ikumi Kayama
58W–27L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Esther McNany
48W–52L career · 6 lines in 2021
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Carol Halliday
69W–42L career · 4 lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.71
4
Gwen Marrion
157W–85L career · 5 lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.70
Stacy Collins
98W–61L career · 5 lines in 2021
8%92%1%
3.69
Kerry Shaheen
35W–20L career · 3 lines in 2021
15%84%<1%
3.63
4
Denise Toce
103W–99L career · 3 lines in 2021
38%62%<1%
3.54
3.5
Barbara Clarke
41W–59L career · 2 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.22
Nancy Bray
70W–113L career · 1 line in 2021
7%92%1%
3.19
Louise Sterling
126W–134L career · 1 line in 2021
25%75%<1%
3.09
Mary Varley
25W–47L career · 1 line in 2021
37%63%<1%
3.04
Jaybel Yazon
46W–51L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Susan Emhoff
76W–38L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.