Teams

OC Laguna Beach Tennis Academy - Coach Mateljan - Sat12

2025 SCTA Doubles 18 & Over - OC · OC Women WE - 3.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-12-13vs OC YLCC - Sandra - Sun1Lost 01
L#2 DoublesYuki Kato Maves / Alison Alexander vs Shannon Langpap / Clara Paye7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2025-11-08vs OC Team Courage LPC - NishaLost 01
L#2 DoublesSusan Dedeluk / Maria Reichel vs Melanie Hoopes / Roya Khairzada1-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-10-10vs OC Lifetime RSC - ChrissyLost 01
L#2 DoublesLeslie Boehm / Dawn Shapiro vs Tania Reed / Chrissy Bird0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women WE - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Jesstine Jones
published
3.49
Alison Alexander
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Yuki Kato Maves
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Nathally Cespedes
published
3.19
Debbie Chin
published 3.5
3.14
Susan Dedeluk
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Dawn Shapiro
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Marcela McKibben
published
3.10
Maria Reichel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
Erin Rudsinski
published
Kelsey Liss
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erin Rudsinski + Nathally Cespedes6450% games+7.5% vs expected
Erin Rudsinski + Alison Alexander9359% games+6.4% vs expected
Dawn Shapiro + Nathally Cespedes4155% games+0.9% vs expected
Erin Rudsinski + Marcela McKibben044 matchesnot enough data
Nathally Cespedes + Debbie Chin303 matchesnot enough data
Alison Alexander + Debbie Chin303 matchesnot enough data
Maria Reichel + Susan Dedeluk123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jesstine Jones
8W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%50%50%
3.50
3.5
Alison Alexander
17W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%52%48%
3.49
Yuki Kato Maves
8W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Nathally Cespedes
15W–15L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Debbie Chin
9W–4L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Susan Dedeluk
4W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
16%84%1%
3.14
3.5
Dawn Shapiro
6W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
19%80%<1%
3.12
Marcela McKibben
14W–38L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
Maria Reichel
6W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.10
Erin Rudsinski
27W–22L career · no lines in 2025
<1%26%74%
3.09
Kelsey Liss
9W–15L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.