Teams

JAlexander (Park Road Park)

2023 Singles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Singles 4.5 Women - Tues PM

6 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-08-22vs KCochran (Queens)Lost 02
L#1 SinglesNily Willis vs Jennifer Ko5-7, 1-6
L#3 SinglesAlison Lacy Sherrill vs Kim Cochran1-6, 1-6
2023-08-15vs LClarke (Jeff Adams)Lost 12
L#1 SinglesJane Sickles vs Sanjana Sudhir1-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesCallie Schmit vs Xersalyn Threet6-0, 6-3
L#3 SinglesAlison Lacy Sherrill vs Elizabeth McCombs6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2023-08-01vs KCochran (Queens)Won 10
W#2 SinglesJane Sickles vs Kristin Verrill6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2023-07-25vs LClarke (Jeff Adams)Lost 02
L#1 SinglesCallie Schmit vs Sanjana Sudhir4-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesJane Sickles vs Claudia Vizzini2-6, 3-6
2023-07-11vs KCochran (Queens)Split 11
L#1 SinglesAlison Lacy Sherrill vs Megan Griffin0-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesNily Willis vs Sandra To6-4, 6-4
2023-06-27vs LClarke (Jeff Adams)Lost 01
L#3 SinglesNily Willis vs Lina Clarke4-6, 4-6
2023-06-13Split 11
L#1 SinglesNily Willis vs Lacey Craig0-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesCallie Schmit vs Jennifer Ko6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2023-06-06vs LClarke (Jeff Adams)Won 10
W#1 SinglesCallie Schmit vs Marie McDaniel6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Singles 4.5 Women - Tues PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.10 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.58
Callie Schmit
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 5
4.57
4.16
Alison Lacy Sherrill
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4.5
3.82
Nily Willis
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 4
3.77
Michelle Fontana
published
3.71
Jane Sickles
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jane Sickles + Nily Willis12458% games+7.2% vs expected
Alison Lacy Sherrill + Jane Sickles3349% games+5.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Callie Schmit
60W–41L career · 4 lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
4.58
5
Hannah English Rahill
16W–6L career · no lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
4.57
4.5
Alison Lacy Sherrill
33W–38L career · 3 lines in 2023
11%88%<1%
4.16
4
Nily Willis
100W–79L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.82
Michelle Fontana
20W–10L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Jane Sickles
104W–72L career · 3 lines in 2023
5%93%1%
3.71

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.