Teams

Game Time

2022 DC WTA Combo · DC WTA Combo 8.5 Men

13 players · average NTRP 4.30 / WASHINGTON D.C.

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-10-02Won 20
W#1 DoublesNicholas McMurray / Soheil Shirzadi vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDemetrius Crawford / Angel Fernandez vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-09-25Won 10
W#2 DoublesDamani Eubanks / Demetrius Crawford vs Ryan Fisher / Bryan Fisher6-4, 5-6
2022-09-18vs On FireWon 10
W#2 DoublesNicholas McMurray / Angel Fernandez vs Raifel Faison / Paul Prince6-0, 6-2
2022-09-11Won 10
W#2 DoublesNicholas McMurray / Abdoul Miloud Agbere vs Jeffrey Ocker / Josh Perry6-4, 6-0
2022-08-21Won 10
W#3 DoublesNicholas McMurray / Kenneth Fowler vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-08-07vs On FireWon 10
W#1 DoublesNicholas McMurray / Matt Morgan vs Joaquin Turley / Ishmael Alejo6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for DC WTA Combo 8.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.04 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.36
Nicholas McMurray
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.34
Ian Lucas
published 4.5
4.28
Damani Eubanks
published 4.5
4.27
Soheil Shirzadi
published
Christopher Andall
published 4.5
Derrick Lewis
published 4.5
4.18
Kenneth Fowler
published
3.77
Frederic Colas
published 4
3.73
3.73
Demetrius Crawford
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.70
Angel Fernandez
published 4
Matt Morgan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Curtis Derek Owens + Angel Fernandez4355% games+2.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Nicholas McMurray
175W–74L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%86%13%
4.36
4.5
Ian Lucas
26W–22L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
4.34
4.5
Damani Eubanks
19W–20L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
4.28
Soheil Shirzadi
17W–8L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
4.27
4.5
Abdoul Miloud Agbere
33W–23L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Christopher Andall
5W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Derrick Lewis
22W–24L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kenneth Fowler
56W–30L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
4.18
4
Frederic Colas
180W–150L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Curtis Derek Owens
24W–32L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Demetrius Crawford
204W–161L career · 4 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Angel Fernandez
30W–28L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
Matt Morgan
5W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.