Teams

Q Team

2023 USTA MIXED 40 & OVER · 8.0 Mixed 40 & Over

8 players · average NTRP 4.10 / MONTANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-08-23vs Mixed NutsLost 02
L#1 DoublesBecky King / Joe Salyer vs Sarah Bach / David Dernbach2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMary Ritchie / Dennis Vap vs Amber Sparks / James Shaffer4-6, 3-6
2023-08-23vs Mixed NutsLost 03
L#1 DoublesMary Ritchie / Dennis Vap vs Sarah Bach / Chuck Smith6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMichael Turley / Darcy Kovacs vs Amber Sparks / James Shaffer5-7, 0-6
L#3 DoublesCameron Rozell / Sara Hemmer vs Joshua Munro / Heidi Shors3-6, 4-6
2023-07-22vs Mixed NutsLost 03
L#1 DoublesBecky King / Joe Salyer vs Chuck Smith / Danielle Smith6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMary Ritchie / Dennis Vap vs Sarah Bach / David Dernbach5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMichael Turley / Darcy Kovacs vs Amber Sparks / James Shaffer2-6, 3-6
2023-07-19vs Mixed NutsLost 12
W#1 DoublesBecky King / Joe Salyer vs Chuck Smith / Danielle Smith6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMary Ritchie / Dennis Vap vs Sarah Bach / David Dernbach0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesCameron Rozell / Sara Hemmer vs Joshua Munro / Heidi Shors5-7, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 8.0 Mixed 40 & Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Q Team0411122136

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.86 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.16
Mary Ritchie
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.98
Sara Hemmer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Dennis Vap
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.45
Becky King
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Darcy Kovacs
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Joe Salyer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Karl Rudbach
published
Michael Turley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dennis Vap + Mary Ritchie044 matchesnot enough data
Mary Ritchie + Michael Turley213 matchesnot enough data
Becky King + Joe Salyer123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Mary Ritchie
36W–56L career · 4 lines in 2023
13%86%1%
4.16
4
Sara Hemmer
27W–30L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%55%45%
3.98
4
Dennis Vap
5W–17L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Becky King
53W–61L career · 3 lines in 2023
>99%<1%<1%
3.45
3.5
Darcy Kovacs
5W–8L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Joe Salyer
5W–5L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Karl Rudbach
1W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Michael Turley
10W–19L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.