Teams

Mixed Nuts

2023 USTA MIXED 40 & OVER · 8.0 Mixed 40 & Over

7 players · average NTRP 4.20 / MONTANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-08-23vs Q TeamWon 30
W#1 DoublesSarah Bach / Chuck Smith vs Mary Ritchie / Dennis Vap4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAmber Sparks / James Shaffer vs Michael Turley / Darcy Kovacs7-5, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJoshua Munro / Heidi Shors vs Cameron Rozell / Sara Hemmer6-3, 6-4
2023-08-23vs Q TeamWon 30
W#1 DoublesSarah Bach / David Dernbach vs Becky King / Joe Salyer6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAmber Sparks / James Shaffer vs Mary Ritchie / Dennis Vap6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJoshua Munro / Heidi Shors vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-07-22vs Q TeamWon 30
W#1 DoublesChuck Smith / Danielle Smith vs Becky King / Joe Salyer2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSarah Bach / David Dernbach vs Mary Ritchie / Dennis Vap7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAmber Sparks / James Shaffer vs Michael Turley / Darcy Kovacs6-2, 6-3
2023-07-19vs Q TeamWon 21
L#1 DoublesChuck Smith / Danielle Smith vs Becky King / Joe Salyer2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesSarah Bach / David Dernbach vs Mary Ritchie / Dennis Vap6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJoshua Munro / Heidi Shors vs Cameron Rozell / Sara Hemmer5-7, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Mixed 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.81 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.15
Amber Sparks
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.09
Joshua Munro
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.88
Sarah Bach
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.78
Danielle Smith
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
David Dernbach
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.17
James Shaffer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Heidi Shors
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joshua Munro + Heidi Shors4154% gamesnot enough data
Joshua Munro + Amber Sparks0534% gamesnot enough data
David Dernbach + Sarah Bach303 matchesnot enough data
Amber Sparks + James Shaffer303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Amber Sparks
51W–16L career · 3 lines in 2023
14%85%1%
4.15
4.5
Joshua Munro
52W–72L career · 3 lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
4.09
4
Sarah Bach
59W–54L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%80%19%
3.88
4
Danielle Smith
59W–50L career · 2 lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.78
4
David Dernbach
13W–6L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
James Shaffer
13W–13L career · 3 lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.17
Heidi Shors
4W–1L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.