Teams

PAlford 18+

2022 Cap Mixed 18 & over · 6.0 Mixed

11 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-08-01vs GFyeSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCassy Albertson / Thomas Albertson vs Gary Fye / Alison Kalinowski3-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesSuzanne Braga / Josh Hastings vs Gregory Knowles / Erin Hemminger6-4, 6-3
2022-07-24vs JRizzoWon 10
W#1 DoublesCassy Albertson / Travis Salts vs Locke Raper / Mary Allison Raper6-2, 6-4
2022-07-20vs LElliott 18+Lost 01
L#3 DoublesPaige Alford / Matthew Alford vs Kari Barsness / Matthew Pare2-6, 0-6
2022-07-17Won 10
W#3 DoublesPatrick Webb / Suzanne Braga vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-07-03vs KhodushWon 20
W#1 DoublesSuzanne Braga / Travis Salts vs David Smith / Aimee Mikula6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesThomas Albertson / Cassy Albertson vs Vina Jordano / AJ Jordano6-1, 6-0
2022-06-26vs DLouzao BC 6.0Won 10
W#2 DoublesCassy Albertson / Drew Hartsfield vs Ian Villanueva / Mary Ellen Wetzler-Behar6-0, 6-1
2022-06-22vs iGLovejoyWon 20
W#1 DoublesPaige Alford / Travis Salts vs Garrett Lovejoy / Leigh McClure1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCassy Albertson / Thomas Albertson vs Kurt Holmberg / Mary Elizabeth Miller6-4, 6-0
2022-06-12vs LHENRYLost 01
L#3 DoublesMatthew Alford / Suzanne Braga vs Christina LeLiever / Jamie LeLiever4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Tyler Priest
published
3.21
Josh Hastings
published
3.20
Jaime Clark
published 3.5
3.13
Paige Alford
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.99
Patrick Webb
published
2.97
Thomas Albertson
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.72
Kathryn White
published
2.71
Megan Slocum
published 3
2.70
Suzanne Braga
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.69
Cassy Albertson
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
Travis Salts
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cassy Albertson + Thomas Albertson10854% games+8.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tyler Priest
4W–12L career · no lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.60
Josh Hastings
4W–3L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Jaime Clark
10W–18L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Paige Alford
121W–138L career · 2 lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
3.13
Patrick Webb
12W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%54%46%
2.99
3
Thomas Albertson
49W–37L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%60%40%
2.97
Kathryn White
1W–7L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.72
3
Megan Slocum
32W–45L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
2.71
3
Suzanne Braga
36W–55L career · 4 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Cassy Albertson
40W–39L career · 5 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
2.69
Travis Salts
2W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.