Teams

DTC SILVER

2021 TRIO - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - TRIO

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-04-24vs STAP YELLOWSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKatherine Koch / Erica Bissette vs Wendy Berhman / Caroline Walker7-6, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKristin O Connell / Robyn Tolva vs Renee Morris / Shannon Brooks3-6, 3-6
2021-04-10vs GTC GREENSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSharon Terry / Julie Vargas vs Holly Welsh / Ginny Crise4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKristin O Connell / Robyn Tolva vs Trace Salzano / Kerri Brown6-4, 6-1
2021-04-03vs BP REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesJulie Vargas / Sharon Terry vs Emily Swenson / Nancy Zhong4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKatherine Koch / Kristin O Connell vs Melanie Escobar / Hilary Navy5-7, 1-6
2021-03-31vs GTC NAVYLost 02
L#1 DoublesKristin O Connell / Katherine Koch vs Crystal Cobb / Sara Springer3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesTina Friedman / Erica Bissette vs Brenda Emerson / Ellen Lee4-6, 6-7
2021-03-20vs CM REDSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJulie Vargas / Sharon Terry vs Delores Dafoe / Alison Thompson5-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesErica Bissette / Katherine Koch vs Jane Miceli / Jan Robbins6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - TRIO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Erica Bissette
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.55
Tina Friedman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Julie Vargas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Katherine Koch
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Kristin O Connell
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Robyn Tolva
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Sharon Terry
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tina Friedman + Erica Bissette10455% games+2.7% vs expected
Kristin O Connell + Robyn Tolva4643% games−5.9% vs expected
Tina Friedman + Katherine Koch134 matchesnot enough data
Erica Bissette + Katherine Koch224 matchesnot enough data
Julie Vargas + Sharon Terry033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Erica Bissette
78W–42L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%74%26%
3.42
Tina Friedman
38W–43L career · 1 line in 2021
34%66%<1%
2.55
Julie Vargas
3W–14L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Katherine Koch
25W–40L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Kristin O Connell
7W–18L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Robyn Tolva
37W–26L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Sharon Terry
1W–4L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.