Teams

BP RED

2021 TRIO - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - TRIO

5 players · average NTRP 3.33 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-04-17vs GTC NAVYLost 12
L#1 DoublesEmily Swenson / Nancy Zhong vs Kari Coughlon / Leah Johnson5-7, 4-6
L#1 SinglesJJ Wagner vs Jill St. John2-6, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMelanie Escobar / Hilary Navy vs Crystal Cobb / Sara Springer6-2, 6-4
2021-04-10vs STAP YELLOWWon 21
L#1 DoublesJJ Wagner / Kristin Nelson vs Christy Wilson / Amy Parent5-7, 4-6
W#1 SinglesHilary Navy vs Sarah Sexton6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesNancy Zhong / Emily Swenson vs Shannon Brooks / Caroline Walker6-3, 7-5
2021-04-03vs DTC SILVERWon 30
W#1 DoublesEmily Swenson / Nancy Zhong vs Julie Vargas / Sharon Terry6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesJJ Wagner vs Julia Dobbins7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMelanie Escobar / Hilary Navy vs Katherine Koch / Kristin O Connell7-5, 6-1
2021-03-27vs CM REDWon 30
W#1 DoublesEmily Swenson / Nancy Zhong vs Jane Miceli / Jan Robbins6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesHilary Navy vs Alison Thompson6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMelanie Escobar / Kristin Nelson vs Delores Dafoe / Mary Hutchison6-4, 6-2
2021-03-20vs GTC GREENWon 30
W#1 DoublesMelanie Escobar / Emily Adams vs Mary Albair / Holly Welsh4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesHilary Navy vs Erin Dunn6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJJ Wagner / Kristin Nelson vs Kerri Brown / Jennifer Pollman6-2, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - TRIO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Hilary Navy
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.32
Kristin Nelson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.81
Nancy Zhong
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.74
JJ Wagner
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.59
Melanie Escobar
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melanie Escobar + JJ Wagner7847% games+3.7% vs expected
Melanie Escobar + Nancy Zhong3251% games−2.8% vs expected
Melanie Escobar + Hilary Navy303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Hilary Navy
31W–4L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Kristin Nelson
115W–102L career · 3 lines in 2021
1%91%9%
3.32
Nancy Zhong
32W–19L career · 4 lines in 2021
1%92%7%
2.81
3
JJ Wagner
68W–56L career · 4 lines in 2021
3%95%2%
2.74
3
Melanie Escobar
53W–52L career · 4 lines in 2021
25%75%<1%
2.59

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.