Teams

JRoss-DUR

2026 Eno River Tri-Level 18 & Over · 18 & Over 4.5

13 players · average NTRP 4.14 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-07-19vs MPaul-DURLost 12
W#1 DoublesNeeta Vora / Anna Tomkins vs Elizabeth Harvie / Hillary Mulder6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJustyne Ross / Cristina Smith vs Jennifer Kuzma / Sapna Varkey1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesCorinne Haywood / Laura Carlson vs Jamie Moy / Katie Evans6-7, 7-6, 0-1
2026-07-12vs CBaddour-CHCCLost 03
L#1 DoublesAnna Tomkins / Bren Woods vs Haley Kutner / Sarah Shelby6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSindhu Shivaji / Cristina Smith vs Keri A Clark / Crissy Haley3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesKristin Cooley / Janelle Howard vs Betsey Duthe / Heather Hutchins7-6, 5-7, 0-1
2026-07-05vs HRoss-DURLost 12
L#1 DoublesAnna Hodges / Bren Woods vs Lindsay Castret / Emily Tinervin7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJustyne Ross / Janelle Howard vs Beth Huebner / Molly Andrews4-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesLoralie Bible / Kristin Cooley vs Tenesha Carter / Amber Oberle6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2026-06-28vs MPaul-DURLost 12
L#1 DoublesAnna Hodges / Justyne Ross vs Spenser Radtke / Tess Weber6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCristina Smith / Laura Carlson vs Aly Miller / Sapna Varkey5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKristin Cooley / Loralie Bible vs Sarah Franks / Hannah White6-4, 6-1
2026-06-21vs CBaddour-CHCCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJustyne Ross / Megan Leonard vs Sara Barfield / Barbara Estay6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCorinne Haywood / Cristina Smith vs Deborah Howard / Joli Stockwell6-3, 6-4
2026-06-18vs HRoss-DURLost 03
L#1 DoublesLauren Herman / Anna Hodges vs Emily Tinervin / Lindsay Castret7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLoralie Bible / Justyne Ross vs Beth Huebner / Heidi Ross3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLaura Carlson / Janelle Howard vs Laurie Straube / Anna Papadopoulos2-6, 4-6
2026-06-07vs MPaul-DURWon 21
L#1 DoublesAnna Hodges / Valerie Acre vs Spenser Radtke / Tess Weber5-7, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJustyne Ross / Corinne Haywood vs Elizabeth Harvie / Jennifer Kuzma6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLoralie Bible / Kristin Cooley vs Katie Evans / Keshia Green6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2026-05-31vs CBaddour-CHCCLost 12
L#1 DoublesNeeta Vora / Bren Woods vs Sara Barfield / Haley Kutner6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesValerie Acre / Cristina Smith vs Crissy Haley / Megan Jones6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJanelle Howard / Corinne Haywood vs Joli Stockwell / Heather Hutchins6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2026-05-24vs HRoss-DURWon 21
L#1 DoublesLauren Herman / Neeta Vora vs Lindsay Castret / Emily Tinervin5-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesValerie Acre / Justyne Ross vs Beth Huebner / Heidi Ross2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCorinne Haywood / Janelle Howard vs Tenesha Carter / Laurie Straube6-4, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.84 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.30
Neeta Vora
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.21
Anna Tomkins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.16
Anna Hodges
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.98
Valerie Acre
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.97
Bren Woods
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.95
Lauren Herman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.92
Sindhu Shivaji
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.79
Justyne Ross
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.71
Cristina Smith
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.68
Kristin Cooley
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.55
Loralie Bible
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.49
Corinne Haywood
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.25
Janelle Howard
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristin Cooley + Loralie Bible25364% games+6.5% vs expected
Bren Woods + Anna Tomkins23472% games+5.3% vs expected
Justyne Ross + Valerie Acre12353% games+1.7% vs expected
Bren Woods + Neeta Vora224 matchesnot enough data
Justyne Ross + Neeta Vora213 matchesnot enough data
Justyne Ross + Anna Hodges123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Neeta Vora
116W–71L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
4.30
4.5
Anna Tomkins
352W–48L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
4.21
4.5
Anna Hodges
7W–14L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
4.16
4
Valerie Acre
131W–57L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
3.98
4.5
Bren Woods
77W–40L career · 3 lines in 2026
59%41%<1%
3.97
4.5
Lauren Herman
16W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
65%35%<1%
3.95
4
Sindhu Shivaji
73W–32L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%72%28%
3.92
4
Justyne Ross
145W–117L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%93%5%
3.79
4
Cristina Smith
5W–12L career · 6 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
3.71
Kristin Cooley
56W–19L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%9%91%
3.68
3.5
Loralie Bible
186W–65L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%35%65%
3.55
3.5
Corinne Haywood
120W–65L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%53%47%
3.49
Janelle Howard
4W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.25

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.