Teams

SSH TEAL

2021 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-09-08vs LTFC GREENWon 21
L#1 DoublesChristine Gish / Kelly Goodnough vs Rebecca McIlwaine / Colette Laporte3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesMadison Irvine vs Alena Sukhovetskyy6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesEmily Dreyer / Kirsten Despain vs Deanne Vizurraga / Kristin Korell6-0, 6-0
2021-09-01vs GCC REDLost 03
L#1 DoublesChristine Gish / Kelly Goodnough vs Elena Greeley / Emer Dempsey3-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesMadison Irvine vs Nicole Conroy6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKaren Allaire / Ingrid Burke vs Jocelyn Goodwin / Jennifer Lloyd1-6, 7-5, 0-1
2021-08-25vs EM BLUELost 12
L#1 DoublesKirsten Despain / Ingrid Burke vs Jean Steimel / Brilynn Cahill1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMadison Irvine vs Kari Hale3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKaren Allaire / Kelly Goodnough vs Judy Leuteneker / Amy Dodge6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2021-08-18vs VC REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesKaren Allaire / Kirsten Despain vs Meghan Baker / Amy McDevitt2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesIngrid Burke / Christine Gish vs Lindsay Needler-Turner / Anna Steele2-6, 4-6
2021-08-11vs GAC REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesChristine Gish / Kirsten Despain vs Reana Kaminsky / Alison Wheeler6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesEmily Dreyer vs Alex Kaminsky6-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKelly Goodnough / Karen Allaire vs Lesley Baker / Sarah Younggren6-3, 6-4
2021-08-04vs PTC ORANGEWon 30
W#1 DoublesKirsten Despain / Emily Dreyer vs Dawn Larson / Joanie Thompson6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMadison Irvine vs Karen Terry2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesIngrid Burke / Christine Gish vs Alyson Tittman / Kerry Stutzman6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2021-07-28vs HW NAVYLost 12
L#1 DoublesIngrid Burke / Emily Dreyer vs Brianna Gass / Sandi Bozanic2-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesMadison Irvine vs Kim Lyons2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKaren Allaire / Kelly Goodnough vs Shelly Russell / Angie Morris2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings37 teams · WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1DTP YELLOW70183896
2WC GOLD6117413150
3BCC GREEN6116513133
4RHCC YELLOW6116516165
5CHCC BLUE5111717152
6CCC YELLOW5215615157
7CK GOLD5213820178
8HG YELLOW4210818147
9GAC NAVY4314716167
10HRCA SILVER4313818134
11CVTA TEAL4314719158
12MEA SILVER4312920169
13PTC ORANGE43111022177
14BCC GOLD43111023176
15PCC GREEN4391226178
16MEA GREY4391227198
17DTP RED4381328213
18SSLGT GREY3491224180
19VC RED3491226198
20SSLT GOLD3481328205
21BRMST PINK34101128209
22LPTC NAVY3471431213
23CVTA YELLOW2591225188
24EM PINK25101126180
25HW NAVY2581327200
26PCC RED2591228189
27SSH TEAL2591229197
28SSLT PURPLE2561532217
29STAP NAVY1651633210
30GR BLUE0751634225
31CVTA ORANGE0741736242
32PRC GOLD0731836229
33KNO PURPLE0731837226
34PCRK RED0721938231
35CACM SILVER0721938233
36SH YELLOW0721939240
37FHCC BLUE0721940242

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.93
Madison Irvine
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.89
Christine Gish
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.80
Emily Dreyer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.74
Kelly Goodnough
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.66
Ingrid Burke
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.62
Kirsten Despain
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.58
Karen Allaire
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Allaire + Kelly Goodnough111647% games−2.0% vs expected
Ingrid Burke + Christine Gish123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Madison Irvine
38W–39L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Christine Gish
38W–33L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%81%19%
2.89
3
Emily Dreyer
68W–83L career · 4 lines in 2021
1%93%6%
2.80
Kelly Goodnough
31W–60L career · 5 lines in 2021
3%95%2%
2.74
3
Ingrid Burke
34W–42L career · type A · 5 lines in 2021
11%89%<1%
2.66
Kirsten Despain
27W–32L career · 5 lines in 2021
18%82%<1%
2.62
Karen Allaire
40W–69L career · 5 lines in 2021
26%74%<1%
2.58

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.