EM PINK
2021 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT
8 players · average NTRP 3.20 / COLORADO
No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.
Schedule7 played
i
Flight standings37 teams · WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT
| Team | W | L | Sets lost | Games lost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1DTP YELLOW | 7 | 0 | 8 | 96 |
| 2WC GOLD | 6 | 1 | 13 | 150 |
| 3BCC GREEN | 6 | 1 | 13 | 133 |
| 4RHCC YELLOW | 6 | 1 | 16 | 165 |
| 5CHCC BLUE | 5 | 1 | 17 | 152 |
| 6CCC YELLOW | 5 | 2 | 15 | 157 |
| 7CK GOLD | 5 | 2 | 20 | 178 |
| 8HG YELLOW | 4 | 2 | 18 | 147 |
| 9GAC NAVY | 4 | 3 | 16 | 167 |
| 10HRCA SILVER | 4 | 3 | 18 | 134 |
| 11CVTA TEAL | 4 | 3 | 19 | 158 |
| 12MEA SILVER | 4 | 3 | 20 | 169 |
| 13PTC ORANGE | 4 | 3 | 22 | 177 |
| 14BCC GOLD | 4 | 3 | 23 | 176 |
| 15PCC GREEN | 4 | 3 | 26 | 178 |
| 16MEA GREY | 4 | 3 | 27 | 198 |
| 17DTP RED | 4 | 3 | 28 | 213 |
| 18SSLGT GREY | 3 | 4 | 24 | 180 |
| 19VC RED | 3 | 4 | 26 | 198 |
| 20SSLT GOLD | 3 | 4 | 28 | 205 |
| 21BRMST PINK | 3 | 4 | 28 | 209 |
| 22LPTC NAVY | 3 | 4 | 31 | 213 |
| 23CVTA YELLOW | 2 | 5 | 25 | 188 |
| 24EM PINK | 2 | 5 | 26 | 180 |
| 25HW NAVY | 2 | 5 | 27 | 200 |
| 26PCC RED | 2 | 5 | 28 | 189 |
| 27SSH TEAL | 2 | 5 | 29 | 197 |
| 28SSLT PURPLE | 2 | 5 | 32 | 217 |
| 29STAP NAVY | 1 | 6 | 33 | 210 |
| 30GR BLUE | 0 | 7 | 34 | 225 |
| 31CVTA ORANGE | 0 | 7 | 36 | 242 |
| 32PRC GOLD | 0 | 7 | 36 | 229 |
| 33KNO PURPLE | 0 | 7 | 37 | 226 |
| 34PCRK RED | 0 | 7 | 38 | 231 |
| 35CACM SILVER | 0 | 7 | 38 | 233 |
| 36SH YELLOW | 0 | 7 | 39 | 240 |
| 37FHCC BLUE | 0 | 7 | 40 | 242 |
Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays
Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.
Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.
Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.
| Jill Wichlens + Sherry Fitzpatrick | 3–2 | 57% games | +11.5% vs expected |
| Jill Wichlens + Liz May | 3–3 | 57% games | +3.4% vs expected |
| Jill Wichlens + Tiffany Sandusky | 5–1 | 54% games | +1.7% vs expected |
| Liz May + Sherry Fitzpatrick | 4–5 | 48% games | +0.5% vs expected |
| Heather Barben + Tiffany Sandusky | 3–0 | 3 matches | not enough data |
| Jill Wichlens + Jll McLain | 1–2 | 3 matches | not enough data |
Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.
Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.