Teams

MTC- Rapoza

2025 Tri-Level 18 & Over - Mobile · 18 & Over 3.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-03-23vs MO - Harrell/McKean Tri-level 18Lost 12
W#1 DoublesEmily Rapoza / Leeanne Jones vs Alecia Harrell / Courtney Billups6-1, 7-6
L#2 DoublesLela Rice / Taicimara Bonora vs Dana McKean / Kaitlyn Culotta Dozier2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesHannah Pilkington / Carrie Dean vs Hannah Broich / Jennifer Hammond2-6, 3-6
2025-03-16vs MTC - ObrienWon 30
W#1 DoublesAlyson Sheppard / Whitney Kuba vs Kristen Roberts / Mary Brandon Scott6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMeredith LaDart / Taicimara Bonora vs Ann Turner James / Ally Smith2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesHannah Pilkington / Nikki Nicholson vs Millie Russell / Allison Garstecki6-3, 7-5
2025-03-09vs MTC - Lee/Kennedy (Tri-level)Won 21
W#1 DoublesEmily Rapoza / Alyson Sheppard vs MISSY HANNAHAN / Kimberly Donnellan3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesWendy Balmes / Kristine Wnuk vs Courtney Henderson / Melissa Hannahan1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesLeah Fox / Taicimara Bonora vs Megan Pennington / Jordan Kennedy6-2, 0-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Emily Rapoza
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.30
Alyson Sheppard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Meredith LaDart
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Whitney Kuba
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Leeanne Jones
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.05
Kristine Wnuk
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.91
Lela Rice
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.90
Wendy Balmes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.63
Hannah Pilkington
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.62
Taicimara Bonora
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.29
Nikki Nicholson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
1.94
Carrie Dean
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wendy Balmes + Kristine Wnuk7257% games+7.5% vs expected
Emily Rapoza + Leeanne Jones123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Emily Rapoza
27W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.34
3.5
Alyson Sheppard
36W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.30
Meredith LaDart
39W–24L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%6%94%
3.22
Whitney Kuba
4W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
8%90%1%
3.19
Leeanne Jones
33W–40L career · 1 line in 2025
15%85%1%
3.15
Kristine Wnuk
16W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%37%63%
3.05
Lela Rice
16W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.91
Wendy Balmes
15W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%77%23%
2.90
Hannah Pilkington
11W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%18%82%
2.63
Taicimara Bonora
14W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
19%80%<1%
2.62
Nikki Nicholson
16W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
0%94%6%
2.29
2.5
Carrie Dean
7W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.94

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.