Teams

MTC - Lee/Kennedy (Tri-level)

2025 Tri-Level 18 & Over - Mobile · 18 & Over 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-03-23vs MTC - ObrienLost 12
L#1 DoublesKimberly Donnellan / Amanda Lee vs Mary Herndon Nordmann / Mary Brandon Scott1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCatherine Hannahan / Courtney Henderson vs Anna Alexander / Ally Smith2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJordan Kennedy / Megan Pennington vs Madelyn St. John / Virginia Obrien6-0, 6-0
2025-03-16vs MO - Harrell/McKean Tri-level 18Lost 12
W#1 DoublesSavannah Vallee / Samantha Zieman vs Aimee Crowley / Jackie Reger6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCatherine Hannahan / Hannah Hartley vs Amber Greene / Hayden Gregg2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMegan Pennington / Leigh Crowley vs Jennifer Hammond / Jill Taylor-Phillips6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2025-03-09vs MTC- RapozaLost 12
L#1 DoublesMISSY HANNAHAN / Kimberly Donnellan vs Emily Rapoza / Alyson Sheppard6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCourtney Henderson / Melissa Hannahan vs Wendy Balmes / Kristine Wnuk6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesMegan Pennington / Jordan Kennedy vs Leah Fox / Taicimara Bonora2-6, 6-0, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
MISSY HANNAHAN
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Savannah Vallee
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Kimberly Donnellan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
Melissa Hannahan
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.01
Catherine Hannahan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.00
Hannah Hartley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.98
Courtney Henderson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.70
Megan Pennington
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.61
Leigh Crowley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Samantha Zieman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hannah Hartley + Courtney Henderson7162% games+13.2% vs expected
Catherine Hannahan + Melissa Hannahan303 matchesnot enough data
Megan Pennington + Melissa Hannahan303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

MISSY HANNAHAN
12W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.45
Savannah Vallee
22W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.40
Kimberly Donnellan
41W–30L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.31
Melissa Hannahan
35W–11L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%13%87%
3.16
3
Catherine Hannahan
18W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
3.01
Hannah Hartley
31W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.00
3
Courtney Henderson
21W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
2.98
Megan Pennington
36W–25L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%8%92%
2.70
Leigh Crowley
23W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
0%21%79%
2.61
Samantha Zieman
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.