Teams

WNCC Anders (ARC South)

Tri-Level 18 & Over USTA WNC 2026 · 18+ TL Women 4.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.70 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-08-12vs WNCC Mohammed (HRC)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesCaroline Anders / Adriane Deeter vs Sallie LaChance / Lisa Young0-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAnne Salter / Beate Madden vs Lisa Burleson / Bridget Hansel6-7, 4-6
2026-07-29vs WNCA Moody (Aston Park)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesBeate Madden / Mary Johnson vs Susanna Saidi / Lee Carson6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAlice Chen / Sherrie Voyles vs Alexandra Moody / Susan Cook2-6, 4-3
L#3 DoublesCaroline Anders / Adriane Deeter vs Kelly Gillis / Hannah Drummond7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2026-07-23vs WNCC Mohammed (HRC)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesJane Christen / Jennifer Hull vs Rachel Stemerman / Jernine Carter0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAdriane Deeter / Amanda Williams vs Jennie West / Bridget Hansel1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCaroline Anders / Tricia Lancor vs Martha Habegger / Janey Cope2-6, 3-6
2026-07-21vs WNCA Moody (Aston Park)Won 30
W#1 DoublesJennifer Hull / Molly Heyn Vaughn vs Susanna Saidi / Beth Meacham6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJane Christen / Amanda Williams vs Rebecca Carchman / Susan Cook6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAdriane Deeter / Caroline Anders vs Hannah Drummond / Kelly Gillis6-2, 7-5
2026-07-13vs WNCC Mohammed (HRC)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesBeate Madden / Jane Christen vs Savannah Smith / Anne-Marie Farmer3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAnne Salter / Sherrie Voyles vs Lisa Burleson / Erica Roberts7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAlice Chen / Caroline Anders vs Sallie LaChance / Lisa Young3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2026-07-08vs WNCA Moody (Aston Park)Won 21
W#1 DoublesJennifer Hull / Jane Christen vs Alexandra Moody / Lee Carson7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSherrie Voyles / Amanda Williams vs Beth Meacham / Josie Thomas6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAlice Chen / Eva Hartman vs Danielle Andrews / Hannah Drummond6-2, 6-4
2026-06-28vs WNCC Mohammed (HRC)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesMolly Heyn Vaughn / Sara Naff Mlo vs Krysten Shepherd / Jernine Carter3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAmanda Williams / Jane Christen vs Bridget Hansel / Erica Roberts6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesCaroline Anders / Eva Hartman vs Janey Cope / Lisa Young0-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-06-10vs WNCA Moody (Aston Park)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesAnne Salter / Sara Naff Mlo vs Susanna Saidi / Beth Meacham6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCaroline Anders / Alice Chen vs Susan Walker / Susan Cook3-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesAdriane Deeter / Tricia Lancor vs Amy Ager / Danielle Andrews6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18+ TL Women 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.12
Molly Heyn Vaughn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.11
Sara Naff Mlo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.01
Beate Madden
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.95
Jane Christen
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.86
Jennifer Hull
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.78
Sherrie Voyles
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.65
Anne Salter
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.47
Adriane Deeter
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.38
Caroline Anders
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.34
Alice Chen
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.31
Eva Hartman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Tricia Lancor
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Caroline Anders + Adriane Deeter224 matchesnot enough data
Caroline Anders + Alice Chen134 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Hull + Beate Madden123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Molly Heyn Vaughn
17W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
4.12
Sara Naff Mlo
15W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
4.11
4
Beate Madden
24W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
4.01
Jane Christen
23W–14L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
3.95
Jennifer Hull
26W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%84%16%
3.86
Sherrie Voyles
36W–16L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%92%5%
3.78
4
Anne Salter
15W–22L career · 3 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
3.65
3.5
Adriane Deeter
26W–20L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Caroline Anders
25W–19L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%80%19%
3.38
3.5
Alice Chen
19W–13L career · 8 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.34
Eva Hartman
26W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
Tricia Lancor
16W–14L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.