Teams

WNCA Moody (Aston Park)

Tri-Level 18 & Over USTA WNC 2026 · 18+ TL Women 4.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-08-19vs WNCC Mohammed (HRC)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesErin Beacham / Josie Thomas vs Savannah Smith / Krysten Shepherd2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSusanna Saidi / Rebecca Carchman vs Lisa Burleson / Jennie West7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKelly Gillis / Quenton Wright vs Lisa Young / Sallie LaChance6-3, 6-3
2026-08-19vs WNCC Mohammed (HRC)Won 10
W#1 DoublesJosie Thomas / Lee Carson vs Yuka Angel / Cindy Bull2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2026-07-29vs WNCC Anders (ARC South)Won 21
L#1 DoublesSusanna Saidi / Lee Carson vs Beate Madden / Mary Johnson1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesAlexandra Moody / Susan Cook vs Alice Chen / Sherrie Voyles6-2, 3-4
W#3 DoublesKelly Gillis / Hannah Drummond vs Caroline Anders / Adriane Deeter5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2026-07-23vs WNCC Mohammed (HRC)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesBeth Meacham / Josie Thomas vs Jernine Carter / Yuka Angel3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesSusanna Saidi / Lee Carson vs Jennie West / Bridget Hansel6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesKelly Gillis / Danielle Andrews vs Janey Cope / Sallie LaChance1-6, 6-7
2026-07-21vs WNCC Anders (ARC South)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesSusanna Saidi / Beth Meacham vs Jennifer Hull / Molly Heyn Vaughn0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesRebecca Carchman / Susan Cook vs Jane Christen / Amanda Williams2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesHannah Drummond / Kelly Gillis vs Adriane Deeter / Caroline Anders2-6, 5-7
2026-07-08vs WNCC Anders (ARC South)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesAlexandra Moody / Lee Carson vs Jennifer Hull / Jane Christen6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBeth Meacham / Josie Thomas vs Sherrie Voyles / Amanda Williams7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDanielle Andrews / Hannah Drummond vs Alice Chen / Eva Hartman2-6, 4-6
2026-06-22vs WNCC Mohammed (HRC)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesAlexandra Moody / Erin Beacham vs Anne-Marie Farmer / Savannah Smith1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Cook / Rebecca Carchman vs Bridget Hansel / Erica Roberts7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKelly Gillis / Quenton Wright vs Sallie LaChance / Lisa Young6-1, 6-2
2026-06-10vs WNCC Anders (ARC South)Split 11
W#1 DoublesSusanna Saidi / Beth Meacham vs Anne Salter / Sara Naff Mlo4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAmy Ager / Danielle Andrews vs Adriane Deeter / Tricia Lancor3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18+ TL Women 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Lee Carson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.73
Josie Thomas
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.72
Susanna Saidi
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.71
Kelly Gillis
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.66
Alexandra Moody
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.66
Beth Meacham
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.64
Erin Beacham
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
Rebecca Carchman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.35
Quenton Wright
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.29
Hannah Drummond
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.21
Danielle Andrews
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.11
Amy Ager
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelly Gillis + Quenton Wright11069% games+10.9% vs expected
Josie Thomas + Beth Meacham4246% games−0.1% vs expected
Lee Carson + Alexandra Moody3353% games−1.8% vs expected
Erin Beacham + Susanna Saidi224 matchesnot enough data
Susanna Saidi + Beth Meacham224 matchesnot enough data
Susanna Saidi + Alexandra Moody134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lee Carson
14W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.91
Josie Thomas
21W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
Susanna Saidi
19W–28L career · 5 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
Kelly Gillis
58W–19L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%7%93%
3.71
4
Alexandra Moody
21W–22L career · 3 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.66
4
Beth Meacham
30W–35L career · 4 lines in 2026
13%87%1%
3.66
Erin Beacham
7W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
16%84%1%
3.64
Rebecca Carchman
30W–27L career · 6 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.63
Quenton Wright
23W–14L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%85%15%
3.35
Hannah Drummond
10W–8L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Danielle Andrews
14W–21L career · 9 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Amy Ager
6W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.11

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.