Teams

Ta.Parise18S

2024 Capital Fall Singles 18 & Over · 4.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 4.64 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-10-29vs Ki.Patrey18S4.5Won 21
L#1 SinglesRamona Holdstock vs Allison Dean1-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesPaula Fernandez-Pita vs Allison Graves6-2, 6-1
W#3 SinglesSue Titka vs Nicole Shifflett6-3, 6-2
2024-10-22vs Le.Boesch18S4.5Split 11
W#1 SinglesPaula Fernandez-Pita vs Lorraine Bowen6-3, 6-2
L#2 SinglesSue Titka vs Leslie Boesch2-6, 1-6
2024-10-21vs Ki.Patrey18S4.5Split 11
W#1 SinglesPaula Fernandez-Pita vs Allison Dean6-1, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesSue Titka vs Button Hall3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-10-01vs Le.Boesch18S4.5Lost 01
L#3 SinglesSue Titka vs Donna Bauman3-6, 4-6
2024-09-22vs Ki.Patrey18S4.5Won 10
W#3 SinglesRamona Holdstock vs Nicole Shifflett6-3, 6-1
2024-09-10vs Le.Boesch18S4.5Split 11
W#1 SinglesPaula Fernandez-Pita vs Meghan Zerkel6-1, 6-1
L#2 SinglesSue Titka vs Donna Bauman6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2024-08-27vs Ki.Patrey18S4.5Split 11
W#1 SinglesDanielle Wilder vs Button Hall6-2, 6-0
L#2 SinglesRamona Holdstock vs Melinda Salchert1-6, 0-6
2024-08-21vs Le.Boesch18S4.5Won 10
W#1 SinglesErin Piechocinski vs Zoe Dubrow6-2, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.24 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.61
Paula Fernandez-Pita
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 5
4.50
Danielle Wilder
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 5
4.37
Tanya Parise
published 4.5
4.16
Erin Piechocinski
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.10
Cheryl Reid
published 4.5
4.09
Ramona Holdstock
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.08
Lucy Lewis
published
4.04
Sue Titka
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #3 Singles 40% · published 4.5
Michelle Vedder
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Danielle Wilder + Tanya Parise123 matchesnot enough data
Danielle Wilder + Sue Titka213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Paula Fernandez-Pita
147W–59L career · type D · 4 lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.61
5
Danielle Wilder
229W–112L career · 1 line in 2024
no projection at this level
4.50
4.5
Tanya Parise
97W–53L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%18%
4.37
4.5
Erin Piechocinski
66W–75L career · 1 line in 2024
13%86%1%
4.16
4.5
Cheryl Reid
38W–32L career · no lines in 2024
23%76%<1%
4.10
4.5
Ramona Holdstock
149W–124L career · 3 lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
4.09
Lucy Lewis
9W–12L career · no lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
4.08
4.5
Sue Titka
93W–110L career · 5 lines in 2024
38%61%<1%
4.04
Michelle Vedder
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.