Teams

CVTA ORANGE

2026 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-13vs RCC REDLost 13
L#1 DoublesLiz Olynyk / Michaela Masciarelli vs Elizabeth Odegaard / Danielle Witte6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAndrea Robbins vs Mary Gritzmacher0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSara Jensen / Emily White vs Kristen Hamill / Kirsten Coppo4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKelly McDevitt / Joyce Kennedy Raymes vs Heather Huelsman / Mary White6-4, 7-5
2026-07-06vs BCC GREENLost 13
W#1 DoublesMichaela Masciarelli / Meredith Rafter vs Jennifer Garcia / Merry Todd2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAndrea Robbins vs Monica Desmoulins1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCynthia Nevison / Julia Garza vs Hope Hanrahan / Lindsay Kirby2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSara Jensen / Emily White vs Melissa Ondash / Tracy Postle6-7, 4-6
2026-06-29vs BTA-C TEALLost 13
L#1 DoublesMichaela Masciarelli / Joyce Kennedy Raymes vs Megan Rudolph / Monica Mortenson0-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesCynthia Nevison vs Audrey Huse1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesTia Bach / Sara Jensen vs Janet King / Tara Sisneros6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKelly McDevitt / Emily White vs Cheryl McBay / Lori Moehn4-6, 1-6
2026-06-22vs BRMST GREENLost 13
W#1 DoublesMichaela Masciarelli / Kerry Hanneman vs Valerie Hudson / Michele Martin7-5, 6-2
L#1 SinglesAndrea Robbins vs Allie Farner2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesTia Bach / Liz Olynyk vs Kirsty Lockhart / Colleen Estrada2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCynthia Nevison / Emily White vs Telia Anderson / Cynthia Manley1-6, 2-6
2026-06-15vs CVTA GREENWon 21
W#1 DoublesKerry Hanneman / Michaela Masciarelli vs Maggie Brubaker / Terry Tessier6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesAndrea Robbins vs Jacqueline Rosains5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMeredith Rafter / Tia Bach vs Nancy Stern / Sofia Vidal-cardenas6-3, 6-4
2026-06-08vs MEA NAVYLost 13
L#1 DoublesTia Bach / Kerry Hanneman vs Mandy Sladden / Kristen Stiles6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesCynthia Nevison vs Julie Lockwood6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLiz Olynyk / Meredith Rafter vs Mary Sznewajs / Lauren Noyes2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJoyce Kennedy Raymes / Kelly McDevitt vs Shannon Ross / Melissa Azer2-6, 2-6
2026-06-01vs NJ BLUESplit 22
L#1 DoublesTia Bach / Liz Olynyk vs Nicole Cotta / Bonita Thistle4-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesAndrea Robbins vs Anne Townsel6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesKerry Hanneman / Joyce Kennedy Raymes vs Heather Roberts / Wendy Vance2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCynthia Nevison / Kelly McDevitt vs Kathleen Gerbino / Janet Colvin6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Emily White
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.78
Kerry Hanneman
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.75
Cynthia Nevison
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3
2.69
Michaela Masciarelli
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.67
Andrea Robbins
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.66
Julia Garza
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.65
Tia Bach
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.62
Kelly McDevitt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.60
Liz Olynyk
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.60
Sara Jensen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.55
Joyce Kennedy Raymes
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.51
Meredith Rafter
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Toni Cowern
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tia Bach + Liz Olynyk5650% games+6.2% vs expected
Kerry Hanneman + Michaela Masciarelli7949% games+0.1% vs expected
Kelly McDevitt + Joyce Kennedy Raymes2440% games−3.8% vs expected
Tia Bach + Sara Jensen3446% games−9.8% vs expected
Kelly McDevitt + Julia Garza2446% gamesnot enough data
Liz Olynyk + Michaela Masciarelli0638% gamesnot enough data
Tia Bach + Kerry Hanneman224 matchesnot enough data
Joyce Kennedy Raymes + Julia Garza134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Emily White
1W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%3%97%
3.27
Kerry Hanneman
12W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Cynthia Nevison
11W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Michaela Masciarelli
31W–60L career · 5 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
2.69
3
Andrea Robbins
4W–21L career · 5 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
2.67
Julia Garza
17W–24L career · 1 line in 2026
13%86%1%
2.66
3
Tia Bach
37W–58L career · 5 lines in 2026
14%86%1%
2.65
Kelly McDevitt
9W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
19%80%<1%
2.62
3
Liz Olynyk
38W–73L career · 4 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
2.60
Sara Jensen
9W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
24%75%<1%
2.60
3
Joyce Kennedy Raymes
32W–51L career · 4 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
2.55
3
Meredith Rafter
13W–48L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
47%53%<1%
2.51
Toni Cowern
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.