Teams

CVTA GREEN

2026 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 2.90 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-13vs BTA-C TEALLost 13
L#1 DoublesMaggie Brubaker / Jennifer Dingman vs Monica Mortenson / Megan Rudolph6-3, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJacqueline Rosains vs Lori Moehn3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesTerry Tessier / Lori Bird vs Tara Sisneros / Kelly Anderson6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesTeresa Chapman / Nancy Stern vs Jo Ann Johnson / Steffani Hafner5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2026-07-06vs NJ BLUELost 13
W#1 DoublesMaggie Brubaker / Jennifer Dingman vs Nina Miranda / Bonita Thistle6-2, 7-6
L#1 SinglesSofia Vidal-cardenas vs Nicole Cotta6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLori Bird / Terry Tessier vs Elsa Zimmerer / Carolyn Keim6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTeresa Chapman / Holly Sprenkle vs Heather Roberts / Wendy Vance2-6, 3-6
2026-06-29vs BRMST GREENLost 13
W#1 DoublesJennifer Dingman / Terry Tessier vs Alden Perkins / Melissa Rawsky7-5, 7-6
L#1 SinglesTeresa Chapman vs Telia Anderson2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesNancy Stern / Lori Bird vs Allie Farner / Kelly Walter2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesHolly Sprenkle / Jacqueline Rosains vs Kirsty Lockhart / Colleen Estrada2-6, 2-6
2026-06-22vs RCC REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesJennifer Dingman / Terry Tessier vs Danielle Witte / Kristen Hamill6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesTeresa Chapman / Nancy Stern vs Elizabeth Odegaard / Kirsten Coppo4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJacqueline Rosains / Sofia Vidal-cardenas vs Ann Marie White / Heather Huelsman6-3, 6-3
2026-06-15vs CVTA ORANGELost 12
L#1 DoublesMaggie Brubaker / Terry Tessier vs Kerry Hanneman / Michaela Masciarelli4-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesJacqueline Rosains vs Andrea Robbins7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesNancy Stern / Sofia Vidal-cardenas vs Meredith Rafter / Tia Bach3-6, 4-6
2026-06-08vs BCC GREENLost 13
L#1 DoublesMaggie Brubaker / Nancy Stern vs Susan Hirano / Melissa Ondash6-7, 6-7
L#1 SinglesTeresa Chapman vs Jennifer Garcia3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesHolly Sprenkle / Sofia Vidal-cardenas vs Kelly Spehar / Merry Todd1-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesJacqueline Rosains / Lori Bird vs Hope Hanrahan / Tracy Postle6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2026-06-01vs MEA NAVYLost 13
L#1 DoublesJennifer Dingman / Louise Fowler vs Mandy Sladden / Shannon Ross6-1, 5-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesTeresa Chapman vs Charity Sevian3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesTerry Tessier / Lori Bird vs Sarah Ahles / Susan Wu4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#3 DoublesHolly Sprenkle / Nancy Stern vs Jina Park / Brendan Ash6-3, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.61 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.85
Maggie Brubaker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.79
Jennifer Dingman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.73
Louise Fowler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.68
Terry Tessier
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.65
Lori Bird
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.60
2.54
Sofia Vidal-cardenas
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.50
Jacqueline Rosains
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 2.5
2.50
Teresa Chapman
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.46
Holly Sprenkle
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.44
Nancy Stern
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maggie Brubaker + Jennifer Dingman8460% games+7.0% vs expected
Terry Tessier + Maggie Brubaker5260% games+4.2% vs expected
Nancy Stern + Maggie Brubaker4545% games+2.4% vs expected
Louise Fowler + Jennifer Dingman6455% games+1.7% vs expected
Terry Tessier + Jennifer Dingman2348% games+0.4% vs expected
Nancy Stern + Holly Sprenkle1444% games−2.6% vs expected
Nancy Stern + Heather Dragon Graham0628% games−5.9% vs expected
Holly Sprenkle + Lori Bird3347% games−6.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Maggie Brubaker
69W–46L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%85%15%
2.85
Jennifer Dingman
16W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.79
Louise Fowler
14W–29L career · 1 line in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Terry Tessier
76W–108L career · 6 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Lori Bird
12W–24L career · 5 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
2.65
Heather Dragon Graham
0W–12L career · no lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
2.60
Sofia Vidal-cardenas
5W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
2.54
2.5
Jacqueline Rosains
13W–44L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%50%50%
2.50
Teresa Chapman
4W–24L career · 6 lines in 2026
50%50%<1%
2.50
Holly Sprenkle
5W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
62%38%<1%
2.46
3
Nancy Stern
76W–93L career · type A · 6 lines in 2026
66%34%<1%
2.44

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.