Teams

Team 9 High Rollers

2023 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Winter · NOVA Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Men

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-03-09vs Team 1 Top ShelfWon 10
W#2 DoublesLarkin Jennings / Robert Luftglass vs Robert Easton / Don Spies6-2, 7-5
2023-03-01vs Team 2 Wise Ace GOATsWon 10
W#2 DoublesBarry Dickman / Ryan Rohn vs Stephen Gotts / Juan Jose Tijero4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-02-05Lost 01
L#2 DoublesBarry Dickman / Anton Malkowski vs Nhat Nguyen / Quang Nguyen2-6, 3-6
2023-01-24vs Team 3Split 11
L#1 SinglesRyan Rohn vs Sanjivan Sivapiragasam6-4, 2-5
W#2 DoublesLarkin Jennings / Robert Luftglass vs Sunjay Berdia / Dayve Forman7-5, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
David Todd
published 4
3.79
Anton Malkowski
published 4
3.78
Frederic Colas
published 4
3.77
Mark Matsko
published
3.70
Ryan Rohn
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.69
Jeff Buhl
published
3.66
Barry Dickman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.66
Jeff Rosenblum
published
3.56
Robert Luftglass
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.47
Jordan Glashow
published
Mike Burgoyne
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ryan Rohn + Robert Luftglass123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
David Todd
58W–28L career · no lines in 2023
1%84%16%
3.86
4
Anton Malkowski
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.79
4
Frederic Colas
180W–150L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%5%
3.78
Mark Matsko
8W–5L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Ryan Rohn
242W–218L career · 2 lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.70
Jeff Buhl
21W–12L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Barry Dickman
90W–123L career · 2 lines in 2023
13%86%1%
3.66
Jeff Rosenblum
40W–31L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%1%
3.66
4
Robert Luftglass
69W–94L career · 2 lines in 2023
35%65%<1%
3.56
Jordan Glashow
2W–9L career · no lines in 2023
58%42%<1%
3.47
Mike Burgoyne
7W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.