Teams

Team 2 Wise Ace GOATs

2023 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Winter · NOVA Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Men

10 players · average NTRP 4.25 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-03-17Won 10
W#1 SinglesTom Ladenburg vs Brian Meli6-1, 6-0
2023-03-10Won 20
W#1 DoublesJonathan Kim / Tom Ladenburg vs Cabell Fooshe / Michael Lepre6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesHelmut Klemperer / Milin Iyer vs Merrick Carey / Anthony Dwyer6-4, 6-4
2023-03-01vs Team 9 High RollersLost 02
L#1 DoublesMilin Iyer / Jonathan Kim vs John Shomaker / Michael Stoltz1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesStephen Gotts / Juan Jose Tijero vs Barry Dickman / Ryan Rohn6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2023-02-19Split 11
L#1 DoublesEric Declerck / Chip Hathaway vs Ralph Nappi / Matt Haas4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLutz Braum / Tom Ladenburg vs Rick Frank / Kahn Le6-3, 5-6
2023-02-03vs Team 5 The WarriorsLost 02
L#1 DoublesChip Hathaway / Robert Kalfus vs Sai Maddi / Ted Breinig6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJuan Jose Tijero vs Jacques Oliver4-6, 3-4
2023-01-26vs Team 1 Top ShelfWon 10
W#1 DoublesMilin Iyer / Jonathan Kim vs Raighne Delaney / James Wagner6-1, 6-3
2023-01-15vs Team 4 High VoltageSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMilin Iyer / Tom Ladenburg vs Murugavel Chengalvarayan / Joong Min6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJuan Jose Tijero vs Eric Ottenheimer6-3, 3-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.88 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.20
Tom Ladenburg
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.18
Robert Kalfus
published
4.10
Chip Hathaway
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.88
Lutz Braum
published
3.80
Juan Jose Tijero
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.59
Milin Iyer
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.42
William Wong
published
Eric Declerck
published
Helmut Klemperer
published
Sumeet Chawla
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Milin Iyer + Tom Ladenburg123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Tom Ladenburg
92W–64L career · type A · 4 lines in 2023
7%91%2%
4.20
Robert Kalfus
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
4.18
4.5
Chip Hathaway
206W–114L career · 2 lines in 2023
23%76%<1%
4.10
Lutz Braum
15W–22L career · no lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
3.88
4
Juan Jose Tijero
605W–364L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%90%8%
3.80
4
Milin Iyer
99W–128L career · 4 lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
3.59
William Wong
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
72%28%<1%
3.42
Eric Declerck
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Helmut Klemperer
7W–10L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sumeet Chawla
23W–12L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.