Teams

ML Birtles FWL A40-3.0W

2023 WMI FWL USTA League Adult 40&Over Weekday Leagues · WMI FWL A40&O 3.0 W (6 player)

16 players · average NTRP 2.83 / WESTERN MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-11-30vs MVS McDonald FWL A40-3.0WWon 21
W#1 DoublesSue Birtles / Mara McGill vs Tara Herrington / Mary McMahon7-6, 6-3
L#2 DoublesCheryl Fedewa / Dona McGovern vs Margaret Greydanus / Tracy Missad5-7, 4-3
W#3 DoublesMelody Werner / Lisette Poletes vs Noelle Brown / Kelly Stafford1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-11-16vs MVS Vincent FWL A40-3.0WLost 12
L#1 DoublesSue Birtles / Mandy Jurkovic vs Kate Vincent / Rachel Ogilvie1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJulie Taiber / Kim Neir vs Christine Ferraiuolo-Dworak / Jean Gawlak-Suggs6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMelody Werner / Cheryl Fedewa vs Kelly Kluting / Evelyn Chung1-6, 0-6
2022-10-26vs HC Bassett FWL A40-3.0WWon 21
L#1 DoublesDona McGovern / Ae Ra Kim vs Kathy Collins / Dawn Hildebrand4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesSue Birtles / Julie Taiber vs Kristen Kennedy / Jane VanderMeer7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMelody Werner / Kim Neir vs Pat Eldean / Barbara Pietrangelo6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · WMI FWL A40&O 3.0 W (6 player)
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1PA Vis FWL A40-3.0W7115922184
2MVS Vincent FWL A40-3.0W6216817176
3MY Guy FWL A40-3.0W53131126230
4MVS McDonald FWL A40-3.0W44131124204
5COE VanWieren FWL A40-3.0W44131124213
6WH Kamerling FWL A40-3.0W35111327227
7MC Labadia FWL A40-3.0W35111333240
8ML Birtles FWL A40-3.0W2681631245
9HC Bassett FWL A40-3.0W2681633244

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.85
Julie Taiber
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.81
Sue Birtles
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Debra Everett
published 3
2.75
Dona McGovern
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.72
Teresa Bell
published
2.71
Lynn Saylor
published
2.71
Melody Werner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.67
Kim Neir
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.61
Lisette Poletes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.26
Cheryl Fedewa
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Ae Ra Kim
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Mandy Jurkovic
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Mara McGill
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Marion Cummings
published
Sherill Hacker
published
Susanne Mohr
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sue Birtles + Julie Taiber4157% games+12.2% vs expected
Mara McGill + Sue Birtles5157% games+6.7% vs expected
Teresa Bell + Dona McGovern2446% games+2.9% vs expected
Melody Werner + Julie Taiber6457% games−2.2% vs expected
Melody Werner + Teresa Bell2545% games−6.6% vs expected
Lynn Saylor + Dona McGovern4946% games−7.4% vs expected
Melody Werner + Dona McGovern2841% games−10.1% vs expected
Cheryl Fedewa + Lynn Saylor3253% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julie Taiber
21W–20L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%87%13%
2.85
Sue Birtles
20W–16L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%92%8%
2.81
3
Debra Everett
6W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Dona McGovern
24W–40L career · 2 lines in 2023
3%95%3%
2.75
Teresa Bell
10W–13L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%1%
2.72
Lynn Saylor
15W–20L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%1%
2.71
Melody Werner
40W–70L career · 3 lines in 2023
5%93%1%
2.71
Kim Neir
6W–13L career · 2 lines in 2023
10%90%1%
2.67
Lisette Poletes
13W–22L career · 1 line in 2023
20%80%<1%
2.61
2.5
Cheryl Fedewa
9W–21L career · 2 lines in 2023
0%97%3%
2.26
Ae Ra Kim
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Mandy Jurkovic
6W–9L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Mara McGill
10W–9L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Marion Cummings
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sherill Hacker
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Susanne Mohr
3W–12L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.