Teams

PA Vis FWL A40-3.0W

2023 WMI FWL USTA League Adult 40&Over Weekday Leagues · WMI FWL A40&O 3.0 W (6 player)

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / WESTERN MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-12-07vs HC Bassett FWL A40-3.0WWon 21
L#1 DoublesHeidi Schliem / Tracy Sodini vs Lori Bloenk / Jane VanderMeer3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSally Chandler / Mary Pringle vs Carol Bassett / Mary Lyons4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJill Mullaney / Deb Vis vs Pat Eldean / Nancy Staal6-2, 6-0
2022-09-21vs MVS McDonald FWL A40-3.0WWon 21
W#1 DoublesTracy Sodini / Deb Vis vs Mary McMahon / Kathleen Sylvester3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPatricia Lajoye / Susan Slater vs Tara Herrington / Debra Sweemer1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesSally Chandler / Mary Pringle vs Kelly Stafford / Noelle Brown6-3, 6-3
2022-09-07vs MVS Vincent FWL A40-3.0WLost 03
L#1 DoublesPatricia Lajoye / Deb Vis vs Kate Vincent / Rachel Ogilvie0-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesNancy Krupp / Sally Chandler vs Barb Cribar / Shar Kraal1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJill Mullaney / Tracy Sodini vs Kelly Kluting / Linda Miller-Heys4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2021-11-17vs MVS Vincent FWL A40-3.5WLost 12
W#1 DoublesSally Chandler / Karen Sterzick vs Michelle Seymour / Alyssa Vandenberg6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSusan Slater / Patricia Lajoye vs Lillian Jackson / Shar Kraal1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesHeidi Schliem / Jill Mullaney vs Linda Miller-Heys / Susan Richardson4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2021-09-08vs MVS Vincent FWL A40-3.0WLost 12
L#1 DoublesTracy Sodini / Deb Vis vs Lillian Jackson / Alyssa Vandenberg6-7, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesPatricia Lajoye / Nancy Krupp vs Rachel Ogilvie / Kate Vincent3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesHeidi Schliem / Sally Chandler vs Susan Kirkwood / Tammy Silk6-7, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · WMI FWL A40&O 3.0 W (6 player)
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1PA Vis FWL A40-3.0W7115922184
2MVS Vincent FWL A40-3.0W6216817176
3MY Guy FWL A40-3.0W53131126230
4MVS McDonald FWL A40-3.0W44131124204
5COE VanWieren FWL A40-3.0W44131124213
6WH Kamerling FWL A40-3.0W35111327227
7MC Labadia FWL A40-3.0W35111333240
8ML Birtles FWL A40-3.0W2681631245
9HC Bassett FWL A40-3.0W2681633244

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
Deb Vis
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.16
Heidi Schliem
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.94
Sally Chandler
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.85
Patricia Lajoye
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.84
Nancy Krupp
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
Lynne Bass
published
2.68
Tracy Sodini
usually #3 Doubles 73%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published
2.67
Wendy Ratza
published
2.67
Susan Slater
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.49
Jill Mullaney
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jill Wilterdink
published
Mary Pringle
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heidi Schliem + Deb Vis3358% games+11.7% vs expected
Nancy Krupp + Heidi Schliem9653% games+9.8% vs expected
Patricia Lajoye + Deb Vis11365% games+8.0% vs expected
Sally Chandler + Lynne Bass5451% games+4.9% vs expected
Patricia Lajoye + Nancy Krupp7649% games+3.8% vs expected
Sally Chandler + Mary Pringle341458% games+2.7% vs expected
Nancy Krupp + Sally Chandler121050% games+2.5% vs expected
Deb Vis + Tracy Sodini271556% games+2.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Deb Vis
122W–72L career · 4 lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Heidi Schliem
60W–43L career · 3 lines in 2023
11%89%<1%
3.16
Sally Chandler
89W–55L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
2.94
Patricia Lajoye
67W–62L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%87%13%
2.85
Nancy Krupp
56W–53L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%89%11%
2.84
Lynne Bass
35W–38L career · no lines in 2023
1%94%5%
2.78
Tracy Sodini
103W–127L career · 11 lines in 2023
8%91%1%
2.68
Wendy Ratza
45W–51L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
2.67
Susan Slater
27W–29L career · 2 lines in 2023
10%89%<1%
2.67
Jill Mullaney
32W–45L career · 3 lines in 2023
52%48%<1%
2.49
Jill Wilterdink
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mary Pringle
66W–29L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.