Teams

CLOVIS TC/CLOVIS NORTH HS 18MX8.0A

2025 MIXED 18&Over · 18&Over MX8.0

10 players · average NTRP 4.25 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-03-09Split 11
L#1 DoublesJeff Ogas / Ruth Ruffe vs Kassy Chauhan / Joseph Duong1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKaitlin Drake / Paul Jelmini vs Alyssa Marie R Chern / David Brand7-5, 6-1
2025-02-28vs CLOVIS TC/BUCHANAN HS 18MX8.0ALost 02
L#2 DoublesRaquel Medina / Paul Jelmini vs Christian Castillo / Charmaine Anne Ramirez2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJeff Ogas / Kathy Lowe vs Alyssa Marie R Chern / David Brand1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-02-15Lost 02
L#2 DoublesCy Hiyane / Stacey Munro vs Alyssa Marie R Chern / Steven Chin3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesBettina Griehl / Paul Jelmini vs Joseph Duong / Kassy Chauhan0-6, 2-6
2025-02-10vs CLOVIS TC/BUCHANAN HS 18MX8.0ALost 02
L#1 DoublesCy Hiyane / Ruth Ruffe vs Sarah Vor / Jazz Chauhan6-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJeff Ogas / Kaitlin Drake vs Alyssa Marie R Chern / Steven Chin1-6, 2-6
2025-01-20vs CLOVIS TC/BUCHANAN HS 18MX8.0ALost 12
W#1 DoublesRaquel Medina / Jeff Ogas vs Clare Marie Castillo / Bee Michael Vang2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCy Hiyane / Stacey Munro vs Kassy Chauhan / Jordan Cabrera0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKaitlin Drake / Paul Jelmini vs Jazz Chauhan / Nicole Roberts2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18&Over MX8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.10
Cy Hiyane
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.98
Paul Jelmini
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.86
Kaitlin Drake
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Bettina Griehl
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
Raquel Medina
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.57
Stacey Munro
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.48
Ruth Ruffe
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.44
Will Gutilla
published
Jeff Ogas
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Kathy Lowe
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Cy Hiyane
0W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
4.10
Paul Jelmini
12W–6L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%56%43%
3.98
Kaitlin Drake
28W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.86
4
Bettina Griehl
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Raquel Medina
6W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
Stacey Munro
9W–16L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%30%70%
3.57
Ruth Ruffe
11W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.48
Will Gutilla
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
3.44
Jeff Ogas
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kathy Lowe
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.