Teams

APEX.Long

2023 CTRL Fall Singles 18 & Over · Fall Singles 18 & Over 3.5 Women

4 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-11-09Lost 01
L#1 SinglesStephanie Hanses vs Megan Redford1-6, 0-4
2023-10-26vs MD.WintersLost 03
L#1 SinglesJennifer Ferralli vs Allie Ligay0-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesStephanie Hanses vs Brigette Flower1-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesKinsey Wennerstrom vs Lindsay Winters2-6, 4-6
2023-10-19Lost 01
L#1 SinglesStephanie Hanses vs Amanda Jordan3-6, 4-6
2023-10-12vs TOC.IrishLost 12
L#1 SinglesJennifer Ferralli vs Najia Cheema1-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesStephanie Hanses vs Elizabeth Enderline1-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesKinsey Wennerstrom vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-09-28vs TOC.StegmanLost 03
L#1 SinglesJennifer Ferralli vs Heather Hastings2-6, 5-7
L#2 SinglesKinsey Wennerstrom vs Abigail Holden2-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesStephanie Hanses vs Sarah Franks1-6, 0-6
2023-09-21vs TOC.IrishLost 02
L#1 SinglesJennifer Ferralli vs Najia Cheema0-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesStephanie Hanses vs Caroline Irish2-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Fall Singles 18 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.10
Jennifer Ferralli
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.02
Kinsey Wennerstrom
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.82
Mary T Long
published
2.77
Stephanie Hanses
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Ferralli + Stephanie Hanses42233% games+2.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jennifer Ferralli
23W–69L career · 4 lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.10
3
Kinsey Wennerstrom
127W–103L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%43%57%
3.02
Mary T Long
48W–104L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Stephanie Hanses
14W–97L career · 6 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
2.77

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.