Teams

MD.Winters

2023 CTRL Fall Singles 18 & Over · Fall Singles 18 & Over 3.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-11-16vs TOC.IrishWon 20
W#1 SinglesMeredith Kinkle vs Najia Cheema6-2, 6-3
W#3 SinglesShari McCandlish vs Caroline Irish6-4, 6-0
2023-11-09Won 10
W#3 SinglesMeredith Kinkle vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-11-02Split 11
L#1 SinglesMeredith Kinkle vs Megan Redford0-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesLindsay Winters vs Amanda Jordan6-1, 6-2
2023-10-26vs APEX.LongWon 30
W#1 SinglesAllie Ligay vs Jennifer Ferralli6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesBrigette Flower vs Stephanie Hanses6-1, 6-0
W#3 SinglesLindsay Winters vs Kinsey Wennerstrom6-2, 6-4
2023-10-19vs TOC.IrishLost 12
L#1 SinglesMeredith Kinkle vs Smita Paranjape6-2, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesShari McCandlish vs Najia Cheema2-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesBrigette Flower vs Meghan O'Hara6-2, 6-1
2023-10-12vs TOC.StegmanWon 20
W#2 SinglesAllie Ligay vs Sarah Franks4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 SinglesLindsay Winters vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-10-05Won 20
W#2 SinglesAllie Ligay vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 SinglesBrigette Flower vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-09-21vs TOC.StegmanLost 12
L#1 SinglesMeredith Kinkle vs Renee Stegman1-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesCait Bauer vs Megan Redford3-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesShari McCandlish vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Fall Singles 18 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Brigette Flower
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.61
Mollie McCauley
published
3.61
Allie Ligay
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #2 Singles 29% · published 3.5
3.53
Cait Bauer
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Lindsay Winters
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Meredith Kinkle
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 38% · published 3.5
2.87
Shari McCandlish
usually #3 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Allie Ligay + Cait Bauer314 matchesnot enough data
Allie Ligay + Lindsay Winters123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brigette Flower
177W–58L career · 3 lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.61
Mollie McCauley
8W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%21%79%
3.61
3.5
Allie Ligay
202W–66L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%22%78%
3.61
3.5
Cait Bauer
86W–51L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%41%59%
3.53
3.5
Lindsay Winters
84W–46L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%90%8%
3.30
3.5
Meredith Kinkle
62W–58L career · 8 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
3
Shari McCandlish
82W–74L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%81%18%
2.87

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.