Teams

Shore Shots

SOUTHERN 40 & Over Summer · 4.5 Women

16 players · average NTRP 4.19 / DELAWARE

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-06-29vs Sandy SkirtsLost 04
L#1 DoublesDoris Kerr / Sandra Ospina vs Stephanie Radebaugh / Yulia Taylor1-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesDanielle Salsbury vs Amy Bundy2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesNikki Basile / Allison Lebo vs Connie McGowan / Amy McMahon5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesTeresa Taylor-King / Kathy Montgomery vs Joanne Guerrera / Kay Bransford4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-06-29vs Sandy SkirtsWon 21
W#1 DoublesDiana Yeagley / Danielle Salsbury vs Amy Bundy / Stephanie Radebaugh6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesNikki Basile vs Delia Tomoiaga6-2, 7-6
L#2 DoublesElisabeth Smith / Gina Conduit vs Kay Bransford / Joanne Guerrera3-6, 4-6
2025-06-28vs Sandy SkirtsLost 13
L#1 DoublesDoris Kerr / Kathy Montgomery vs Amy Bundy / Stephanie Radebaugh2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesRegina Roesner vs Delia Tomoiaga4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesNikki Basile / Gina Conduit vs Joanne Guerrera / Kay Bransford6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMolly Higgins / Kristin Stewart Smoot vs Katherine Alexander / Colleen Stoltz3-6, 0-6
2025-06-28vs Sandy SkirtsSplit 22
L#1 DoublesDoris Kerr / Sandra Ospina vs Amy McMahon / Yulia Taylor6-7, 6-1, 0-1
L#1 SinglesTeresa Taylor-King vs Delia Tomoiaga3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesElisabeth Smith / Gina Conduit vs Connie McGowan / Katherine Alexander5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKris Dommes / Regina Roesner vs Debbie LeHardy / Diane Lewis1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-06-27vs Sandy SkirtsSplit 22
L#1 DoublesTeresa Taylor-King / Doris Kerr vs Connie McGowan / Stephanie Radebaugh5-7, 1-6
W#1 SinglesRegina Roesner vs Delia Tomoiaga4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKathy Montgomery / Gina Conduit vs Amy Bundy / Yulia Taylor3-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesAllison Lebo / Nikki Basile vs Colleen Stoltz / Diane Lewis6-4, 6-1
2025-06-27vs Sandy SkirtsSplit 22
L#1 DoublesTeresa Taylor-King / Sandra Ospina vs Amy McMahon / Yulia Taylor4-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesNikki Basile vs Colleen Stoltz6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAllison Lebo / Elisabeth Smith vs Joanne Guerrera / Kay Bransford7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMolly Higgins / Kristin Stewart Smoot vs Katherine Alexander / Diane Lewis6-3, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Sandy Skirts06141023207
2Shore Shots06101433241

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.89 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.17
Nikki Basile
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.13
Diana Yeagley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.11
Allison Lebo
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.95
Danielle Salsbury
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.89
Sandra Ospina
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.84
Doris Kerr
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.77
Meghan Sutherland
published
Elisabeth Smith
published 4
Gina Conduit
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.57
Regina Roesner
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.55
Kristin Stewart Smoot
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Amy Crain
published
Kathy Montgomery
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Kris Dommes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Molly Higgins
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Teresa Taylor-King
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristin Stewart Smoot + Teresa Taylor-King213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Nikki Basile
68W–27L career · 5 lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
4.17
4.5
Diana Yeagley
82W–121L career · 1 line in 2025
17%83%<1%
4.13
4.5
Allison Lebo
22W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
4.11
4
Danielle Salsbury
267W–152L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.95
Sandra Ospina
8W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
79%21%<1%
3.89
4
Doris Kerr
138W–117L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.84
Meghan Sutherland
14W–13L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Elisabeth Smith
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Gina Conduit
2W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Regina Roesner
55W–82L career · 3 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.57
Kristin Stewart Smoot
4W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.55
Amy Crain
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kathy Montgomery
53W–44L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kris Dommes
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Molly Higgins
40W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Teresa Taylor-King
11W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.