Teams

PRKR NAVY

2025 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-14vs CCV BLUEWon 40
W#1 DoublesKatherine Wilson / Erika Fox vs Buffy Ransom / Shanna Landin6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesGelsey Azhderian vs Jean Duggan6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesWendy Eckert / Robin Mortenson vs Georgene Pedrie / Amy Anema6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSusan Goldman / Kristen Warnick vs Kelli Nesbitt / Beth Hoffman1-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-07-07vs SS-LT REDLost 13
L#1 DoublesGelsey Azhderian / Stephanie Smith vs Sara Percival / Heather Kuzma3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesAndrea Vickers vs Sheila Marino7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLisa Mullins / Susan Goldman vs Rebecca Dalzell / Kelly Katsnelson3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLaura Hunter / Vicky M Martin vs Ingrid Burke / Beth Reedy4-6, 3-6
2025-06-30vs PCC REDLost 13
L#1 DoublesRobin Mortenson / Kristen Warnick vs Misty Candela / Nancy Meyer3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesLisa Mullins vs Laura Wren4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAndrea Vickers / Katherine Wilson vs Barbara Lyon / Mary Pearce3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesShannon Fronapfel / Laura Hunter vs Dawn D'Amato / Melissa Holler7-5, 6-1
2025-06-23vs PRC BLUELost 13
W#1 DoublesErika Fox / Stephanie Smith vs Erika Pope / Stephanie Enright6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesGelsey Azhderian vs Emily Carter3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRobin Mortenson / Katherine Wilson vs Kari Graham / Sharon Kisch3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSusan Goldman / Laura Hunter vs Celeste Gardner / Janice Nelson0-6, 3-6
2025-06-16vs RRTC NAVYLost 13
L#1 DoublesShannon Fronapfel / Stephanie Smith vs Shannon Elam / Lauren Behm1-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesErika Fox vs Karen Miao6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLisa Mullins / Andrea Vickers vs Janice Ramirez / Rachel Hiemstra1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesWendy Eckert / Vicky M Martin vs Michelle McDonald / Miranda Ku2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-06-09vs PRC GREENLost 12
W#1 DoublesKristen Warnick / Erika Fox vs Kate Pulliam / Michelle Sanchez6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesVicky M Martin / Shannon Fronapfel vs Karen Bielenberg / Whitney Coakley2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRobin Mortenson / Wendy Eckert vs Laurie Lehmann / Sarah Schmitz5-7, 4-6
2025-06-02vs SH GREENWon 30
W#1 DoublesGelsey Azhderian / Stephanie Smith vs MELISSA DRAZEN-SMITH / Bongsook Riewe6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKristen Warnick / Andrea Vickers vs Rachel Brand / Susan Kim6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesVicky M Martin / Wendy Eckert vs Catherine Winter / Suzy Vaughn6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.00
Gelsey Azhderian
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.88
Erika Fox
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.84
Andrea Vickers
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.74
Robin Mortenson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.68
Wendy Eckert
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.64
Lisa Mullins
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.64
Shannon Fronapfel
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.55
Vicky M Martin
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.52
Laura Hunter
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.47
Kristen Warnick
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristen Warnick + Erika Fox4256% games+15.7% vs expected
Lisa Mullins + Laura Hunter4158% games+15.1% vs expected
Andrea Vickers + Gelsey Azhderian4351% games+8.2% vs expected
Lisa Mullins + Andrea Vickers7454% games+7.3% vs expected
Robin Mortenson + Andrea Vickers4352% games+5.1% vs expected
Kristen Warnick + Wendy Eckert4451% games+3.9% vs expected
Shannon Fronapfel + Robin Mortenson2341% games+3.0% vs expected
Kristen Warnick + Robin Mortenson3352% games+1.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Gelsey Azhderian
71W–36L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.00
3
Erika Fox
23W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.88
3
Andrea Vickers
125W–120L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%89%10%
2.84
Robin Mortenson
52W–82L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%95%2%
2.74
Wendy Eckert
25W–50L career · 4 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
2.68
Lisa Mullins
41W–44L career · 3 lines in 2025
13%86%<1%
2.64
3
Shannon Fronapfel
104W–127L career · 3 lines in 2025
14%85%<1%
2.64
Vicky M Martin
35W–75L career · 4 lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
2.55
Laura Hunter
29W–40L career · 3 lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
2.52
3
Kristen Warnick
45W–56L career · 4 lines in 2025
59%41%<1%
2.47

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.