Teams

SS-LT RED

2025 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-14vs RRTC NAVYLost 04
L#1 DoublesKelly Katsnelson / Rebecca Dalzell vs Lauren Behm / Janice Ramirez0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesSara Percival vs Rita Fitzpatrick4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesTara Crockett / Beth Reedy vs Jennifer Bell / Shannon Elam2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesIngrid Burke / Amy Koldyke vs Michelle McDonald / Karen Miao0-6, 2-6
2025-07-07vs PRKR NAVYWon 31
W#1 DoublesSara Percival / Heather Kuzma vs Gelsey Azhderian / Stephanie Smith6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesSheila Marino vs Andrea Vickers5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRebecca Dalzell / Kelly Katsnelson vs Lisa Mullins / Susan Goldman6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesIngrid Burke / Beth Reedy vs Laura Hunter / Vicky M Martin6-4, 6-3
2025-06-30vs PRC GREENWon 21
W#1 DoublesKelly Katsnelson / Heather Kuzma vs Shawna Allen / Karen Bielenberg6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSheila Beurket / Rebecca Dalzell vs Lorri Basile / Betsy Tapp6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesTara Crockett / Ingrid Burke vs Whitney Coakley / Laurie Lehmann2-6, 5-7
2025-06-23vs PCC REDWon 21
L#1 SinglesRebecca Dalzell vs Laura Wren2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesSara Percival / Heather Kuzma vs Nancy Meyer / Patricia Dutton6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSheila Marino / Ingrid Burke vs Patti Milhan / Misty Candela7-6, 6-3
2025-06-16vs SH GREENSplit 22
L#1 DoublesKelly Katsnelson / Rebecca Dalzell vs Susan Kim / Bongsook Riewe7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesBeth Reedy vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesSheila Marino / Heather Kuzma vs Rachel Brand / Cathy McFarland2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSara Percival / Ingrid Burke vs Moonkyoung Kim / Michelle Markoff5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2025-06-09vs PRC BLUELost 04
L#1 DoublesAmy Koldyke / Heather Kuzma vs Jackie Smith / Erika Pope3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesSheila Beurket vs Kelli Swan6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSara Percival / Kelly Katsnelson vs Amber Harris / Sarah Hughes3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTara Crockett / Ingrid Burke vs Celeste Gardner / Michele Shaw6-7, 2-6
2025-06-02vs CCV BLUESplit 22
L#1 DoublesSara Percival / Beth Reedy vs Buffy Ransom / Shanna Landin6-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesRebecca Dalzell vs Kristin Chapman1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesSheila Marino / Heather Kuzma vs Jean Duggan / Erin Miller6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesTara Crockett / Sheila Beurket vs Beth Hoffman / Georgene Pedrie6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.93
Sara Percival
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.91
Heather Kuzma
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.86
Beth Reedy
usually #1 Doubles 25%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.80
Sheila Marino
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.79
Tara Crockett
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.74
Rebecca Dalzell
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.66
Ingrid Burke
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.54
Amy Koldyke
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.53
Sheila Beurket
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.49
Kelly Katsnelson
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Koldyke + Heather Kuzma6257% games+12.9% vs expected
Sara Percival + Heather Kuzma9164% games+9.0% vs expected
Sara Percival + Beth Reedy10358% games+6.2% vs expected
Sheila Marino + Heather Kuzma10654% games+5.5% vs expected
Rebecca Dalzell + Tara Crockett5255% games+5.3% vs expected
Rebecca Dalzell + Ingrid Burke7452% games+1.5% vs expected
Ingrid Burke + Sheila Marino1447% games+1.2% vs expected
Sara Percival + Sheila Marino9556% games−1.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Sara Percival
73W–51L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Heather Kuzma
51W–16L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%74%25%
2.91
3
Beth Reedy
37W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
2.86
3
Sheila Marino
55W–56L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
2.80
Tara Crockett
22W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Rebecca Dalzell
106W–65L career · 6 lines in 2025
4%92%3%
2.74
Ingrid Burke
18W–20L career · 6 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
2.66
3
Amy Koldyke
63W–64L career · 2 lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
2.54
Sheila Beurket
9W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
2.53
3
Kelly Katsnelson
43W–33L career · 5 lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
2.49

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.