Teams

HFTC - Court Divas

2025 HTA Spring NA - Ladies Singles Wednesday · 3.5 Ladies Singles

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-03-05vs Lost Forest - The AlphaLost 03
L#1 SinglesMeggan Gittens vs Victoria Leyva0-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesLaura Palmero vs Mimi Chan3-6, 2-6
L#4 SinglesBreanna Washington vs Jiali Yang2-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesSharia Hernandez vs Andee Marshall6-3, 6-4
W#4 SinglesBreanna Washington vs Viviana Tastard3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesLaura Palmero vs Kristin Slay4-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesMeggan Gittens vs Paola Tucker1-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesVarinia Ramirez Enciso vs Karen Harvie4-6, 4-6
L#4 SinglesSharia Hernandez vs Jessica Llamas0-6, 4-6
2025-02-05vs LLTC - Smash Hit SinglesLost 12
L#1 SinglesMeggan Gittens vs Jessica Lin3-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesVarinia Ramirez Enciso vs An Phan6-4, 6-4
L#3 SinglesSharia Hernandez vs Rebecca Chua1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Ladies Singles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Linda Jacobs
published
2.96
Alison West
published 3
2.77
Breanna Washington
usually #4 Singles 100% · published 3
Laura Palmero
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Meggan Gittens
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Natalia Williams
published
Sharia Hernandez
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #4 Singles 33% · published
Varinia Ramirez Enciso
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Linda Jacobs
47W–78L career · no lines in 2025
88%12%<1%
3.33
3
Alison West
8W–31L career · no lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
2.96
3
Breanna Washington
7W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
Laura Palmero
3W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Meggan Gittens
3W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Natalia Williams
6W–13L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sharia Hernandez
5W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Varinia Ramirez Enciso
5W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.