Teams

MONTE VISTA HS 40AW3.5B

2025 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 3.5

18 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Sanna Garcia
published
3.36
3.28
Janet Race
published
3.25
Nancy Blom
published
3.24
Dana Andrew
published 3.5
3.21
Cathy Althoff
published 3.5
3.17
Cynthia Attiyeh
published 3.5
3.11
Teri Frangie
published
3.09
Vanya Georgieva
published
3.06
Florence Huang
published
3.03
Maria Chiang
published
2.98
Florita Labrador
published
2.97
Patty Ly
published
2.96
Patricia Powers
published
2.93
Daljeet Singh
published 3.5
2.90
Meilan Liu
published
2.88
Susan Levy
published
Mayra Dominguez
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Blom + Cathy Althoff5646% games−6.6% vs expected
Daljeet Singh + Sanna Garcia044 matchesnot enough data
Janet Race + Cynthia Attiyeh123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sanna Garcia
13W–23L career · no lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.43
3.5
Caroline D Sherbourne
9W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.36
Janet Race
9W–21L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Nancy Blom
12W–11L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Dana Andrew
10W–23L career · no lines in 2025
4%92%3%
3.24
3.5
Cathy Althoff
8W–14L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Cynthia Attiyeh
11W–21L career · type A · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Teri Frangie
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
Vanya Georgieva
8W–8L career · no lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.09
Florence Huang
5W–15L career · no lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.06
Maria Chiang
11W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.03
Florita Labrador
70W–72L career · no lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
2.98
Patty Ly
18W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
2.97
Patricia Powers
5W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
2.96
3.5
Daljeet Singh
3W–25L career · no lines in 2025
70%30%<1%
2.93
Meilan Liu
10W–22L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.90
Susan Levy
2W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.88
Mayra Dominguez
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.