Teams

Pelican Bay North- Cohen

2024 Collier Adult 65 & Over ESL Fall · Adult 65 & Over 8.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_7

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-12-13Won 10
W#3 DoublesLisbeth Wilson / Becky Cutts vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#1 DoublesLisbeth Wilson / Susan Levine vs Kathy Thurston / Peggy Kasilowski5-7, 2-6
2023-11-29vs Vineyards - SpiwakSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLisbeth Wilson / Susan Levine vs Debra Bowenkamp / Cari Shaw6-0, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDebra Bowman / Megan Cohen vs Mercedes Baumann / Brenda Bensmiller6-2, 6-4
2023-11-19vs Lighthouse Bay - L.BoydWon 10
W#1 DoublesLisbeth Wilson / Susan Levine vs Barbara Fortunato / Gail Wille6-2, 6-1
W#1 DoublesLisbeth Wilson / Susan Levine vs Barbara Tilley / Ellen Schmidt6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesMegan Cohen / Mary Lou Roush vs Kathy Thurston / Ricki Levine2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2023-11-01vs Vineyards - SpiwakWon 10
W#3 DoublesMegan Cohen / Mary Lou Roush vs Nancy Spiwak / Brenda Bensmiller6-0, 6-0
2023-10-25vs Lighthouse Bay - L.BoydLost 01
L#1 DoublesSusan Levine / Megan Cohen vs Barbara Fortunato / Gail Wille3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMegan Cohen / Patricia Clayman vs Minok Allen / Marguerite Bromley5-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 65 & Over 8.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Teresa Benjamin
published
3.09
Becky Cutts
published 3.5
Lisbeth Wilson
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Megan Cohen
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Patricia Clayman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sarah Ford
published
Susan Levine
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisbeth Wilson + Susan Levine8557% gamesnot enough data
Lisbeth Wilson + Megan Cohen224 matchesnot enough data
Megan Cohen + Susan Levine213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Teresa Benjamin
13W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
3.42
3.5
Becky Cutts
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.09
Lisbeth Wilson
63W–45L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Megan Cohen
38W–39L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Patricia Clayman
56W–29L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Sarah Ford
11W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Susan Levine
72W–29L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.