Teams

Lighthouse Bay - L.Boyd

2024 Collier Adult 65 & Over ESL Fall · Adult 65 & Over 8.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.83 / REGION_7

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-12-13vs Pelican Bay North- CohenLost 02
L#1 DoublesGinny Asgeirsson / Kathie Karp vs Debra Bowman / Teresa Benjamin1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLinda Boyd / Karen Dunbar vs Sarah Ford / Mary Lou Roush4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKaren Dunbar / Ginny Asgeirsson vs Colleen Burns Keenan / Ricki Levine4-6, 2-6
2023-11-19Lost 01
L#2 DoublesGinny Asgeirsson / Karen Dunbar vs Becky Cutts / Marilynn Stuart6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKathie Karp / Linda Boyd vs Peggy Kasilowski / Kathy Thurston1-6, 1-6
2023-10-25Lost 01
L#3 DoublesGinny Asgeirsson / Karen Dunbar vs Becky Cutts / Mary Lou Roush5-7, 1-6
2023-10-18Lost 01
L#2 DoublesGinny Asgeirsson / Kathie Karp vs Angela Aline / Brenda Bensmiller3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 DoublesSusan Colgan / Karen Dunbar vs Barbara Tilley / Gail Hayton0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKathie Karp / Ginny Asgeirsson vs Colleen Burns Keenan / Peggy Reynolds3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 65 & Over 8.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
3.10
Cindy Benike
published 3.5
Gail Wille
published
Ginny Asgeirsson
published
Karen Dunbar
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Kathie Karp
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Linda Boyd
published
Mary Latini
published
Susan Colgan
published
Tricia Blakeslee
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathie Karp + Ginny Asgeirsson4255% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Carron Rutherford
1W–0L career · type S · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Barbara Fortunato
6W–2L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.70
3.5
Cindy Benike
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
23%76%<1%
3.10
Gail Wille
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Ginny Asgeirsson
7W–16L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Karen Dunbar
38W–76L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Kathie Karp
66W–71L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Linda Boyd
15W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Mary Latini
2W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Susan Colgan
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Tricia Blakeslee
24W–90L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.