Teams

7 ACAC Jones/Litz

2024 Richmond Adult 40 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Weekend Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.42 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-07-25vs 4 ACAC/Davis Lobs of Fun!Won 10
W#2 DoublesIrene Quilez / Martinique Kandl vs Amanda Monger / Yasmin Lutterbie7-6, 6-2
2024-07-20vs 5 TDC CarlyleLost 01
L#1 DoublesDeanne Ralston / Barbara Kasten vs Annmarie Lobred / Justine Sherman5-7, 3-6
2024-07-14vs 3 Woodlake-Poindexter/EstesLost 02
L#1 DoublesNikki Callaghan / Martinique Kandl vs Christine Lemons / Kimberly Ritter3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesBarbara Kasten / Jennifer Booth vs Stacey Cabral / Cindy Birnbaum2-6, 2-6
2024-06-22vs 10 Southampton BrownWon 10
W#1 DoublesMartinique Kandl / Nikki Callaghan vs Beth Jones / Beth Morris2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-06-16vs 6 Westwood HarkerWon 10
W#2 DoublesKimberly Jones / Barbara Kasten vs Heather Harker / Katherine Towler6-4, 6-2
2024-06-07Won 10
W#3 DoublesBarbara Kasten / Martinique Kandl vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Weekend Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Robin Griffith
published
3.43
Martinique Kandl
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.29
Diane Linderman
published 3.5
3.27
Barbara Kasten
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.27
Lori Strobl
published
3.25
Rebecca Cassilly
published
3.22
Nikki Callaghan
published
3.20
Deanne Ralston
published 3.5
3.17
Irene Quilez
published
3.10
Dawn MacHonis
published 3.5
2.94
Cecilia Bergh
published 3
Lisa Aaron
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rebecca Cassilly + Deanne Ralston3249% games−7.9% vs expected
Martinique Kandl + Barbara Kasten6160% gamesnot enough data
Cecilia Bergh + Rebecca Cassilly213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Robin Griffith
32W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
Martinique Kandl
166W–65L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Diane Linderman
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Barbara Kasten
156W–66L career · 4 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
Lori Strobl
27W–20L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
Rebecca Cassilly
18W–15L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.25
Nikki Callaghan
6W–4L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Deanne Ralston
7W–7L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.20
Irene Quilez
6W–12L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.17
3.5
Dawn MacHonis
5W–9L career · no lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
3.10
3
Cecilia Bergh
15W–19L career · no lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
2.94
Lisa Aaron
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.