Teams

LVTA RED

2021 ITA MIXED DOUBLES - NOCO · MIXED 7.5 - ITA - NOCO

8 players · average NTRP 3.70 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-08-22vs HMTCLost 01
L#1 DoublesJeff Fugate / Meredith Lorick vs Michael Robeson / Kimberly Tomlinson7-6, 1-6, 0-1
2021-08-15vs LVTA PURPLESplit 11
W#1 DoublesMeredith Lorick / Cory Lynch vs Elizabeth Smith / Brian Smith2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAshley Kasprzak / David Kasprzak vs Christina Whalen / Jared Petersen4-6, 2-6
2021-08-08vs TAGLost 02
L#1 DoublesCory Lynch / Meredith Lorick vs Jaden Ray / Anja Mau2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDavid Kasprzak / Ashley Kasprzak vs Robert Herrera / Janice Mossberg2-6, 2-6
2021-07-25vs HMTCSplit 11
W#2 DoublesMeredith Lorick / Cory Lynch vs Kendal Sanders / Holly K. Brown7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesAshley Kasprzak / David Kasprzak vs Rebecca Tatman / Jeff Nyland3-6, 1-6
2021-07-18vs LVTA PURPLELost 02
L#1 DoublesMeredith Lorick / Cory Lynch vs Elizabeth Smith / Brian Smith3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAshley Kasprzak / David Kasprzak vs Sonda Huhta / Zachary Schaefer1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 7.5 - ITA - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.04
Meredith Lorick
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.87
Cory Lynch
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.42
Heidi Abrahamson
published 3.5
3.32
Ashley Kasprzak
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Elizabeth Gowins
published 3.5
Jeff Abrahamson
published
Jeff Fugate
published
William Donkersgoed
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cory Lynch + Meredith Lorick81549% games+2.7% vs expected
Heidi Abrahamson + Jeff Abrahamson3644% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Meredith Lorick
101W–47L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%37%63%
4.04
4
Cory Lynch
32W–47L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%84%15%
3.87
3.5
Heidi Abrahamson
55W–26L career · no lines in 2021
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Ashley Kasprzak
39W–48L career · 4 lines in 2021
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Elizabeth Gowins
9W–7L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Jeff Abrahamson
11W–8L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Jeff Fugate
9W–6L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
William Donkersgoed
15W–44L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.