Teams

LVTA PURPLE

2021 ITA MIXED DOUBLES - NOCO · MIXED 7.5 - ITA - NOCO

6 players · average NTRP 3.67 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-08-22vs TAGLost 01
L#3 DoublesDawn Petersen / Jared Petersen vs Lisa Novacek / Joe Ashbee2-6, 4-6
2021-08-15vs LVTA REDWon 10
W#2 DoublesSonda Huhta / Zachary Schaefer vs Elizabeth Gowins / William Donkersgoed6-2, 6-0
2021-08-08vs HMTCWon 20
W#2 DoublesChristina Whalen / Adam Less vs Rebecca Tatman / Jeff Nyland6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSonda Huhta / Zachary Schaefer vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-07-25vs TAGSplit 11
W#2 DoublesDawn Petersen / Jared Petersen vs Laura Johnson / Rajesh Gopalakrishnan0-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesChristina Whalen / Adam Less vs Lisa Novacek / Joe Ashbee6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2021-07-18vs LVTA REDWon 20
W#2 DoublesSonda Huhta / Zachary Schaefer vs Ashley Kasprzak / David Kasprzak6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDawn Petersen / Jared Petersen vs Elizabeth Gowins / William Donkersgoed6-3, 6-3
2021-07-11vs HMTCSplit 11
W#2 DoublesSonda Huhta / Zachary Schaefer vs Holly K. Brown / Stu Hoime6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesDawn Petersen / Jared Petersen vs Rebecca Tatman / Jeff Nyland4-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 7.5 - ITA - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Jared Petersen
published
3.83
Sonda Huhta
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.82
Adam Less
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
2.87
Dawn Petersen
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Christina Whalen
published
Zachary Schaefer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jared Petersen + Christina Whalen3354% games−1.0% vs expected
Jared Petersen + Sonda Huhta14851% games−2.1% vs expected
Jared Petersen + Dawn Petersen81346% games−3.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jared Petersen
68W–59L career · no lines in 2021
<1%86%14%
3.86
4
Sonda Huhta
98W–85L career · 4 lines in 2021
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Adam Less
76W–49L career · 2 lines in 2021
1%91%8%
3.82
3
Dawn Petersen
70W–102L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%83%16%
2.87
Christina Whalen
5W–11L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Zachary Schaefer
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.