Teams

Stonebriar/Woodson W4.0T

2026 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & Over ADULT S · S W. Thursday League

17 players · average NTRP 3.75 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-06-11vs Kiest/Albus W4.0TLost 12
W#1 DoublesErin Scannell / Michelle Woodson vs Caroline Bishop / Jennifer Pine7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAndrea Tuttle vs Kaley Medina3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLea Plamann / Barbara Donovan vs Aya Singleton / Nicole Taylor1-6, 1-6
2026-06-04Lost 14
W#1 DoublesMichelle Woodson / Julie Dickson vs Jennifer Baxter / Sundee McDonald6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesHappy Mason vs Galia Goya2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesElka Wyse / Erin Carlson vs Kristin Rosenbaum / Stacy Nobles2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesAndrea Tuttle vs Linsey Ethington6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSharon Naukam / Anne Smith vs Michaela Cady / Mary Alyce Kaetzel4-6, 4-6
2026-05-29vs RGAC/Raley-Stark W4.0TLost 12
L#1 DoublesJulie Dickson / Connie Ewing vs Gretchen English / Kelley Stark5-7, 5-7
W#1 SinglesHappy Mason vs Anya Preece5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesErin Scannell / Carmel Wood vs Christina Lafferty / Hayley Hill6-7, 4-6
2026-05-28vs SMU/Park-Crow W4.0TLost 14
L#1 DoublesErin Scannell / Michelle Woodson vs Brooke Armstrong / Elizabeth Vice0-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesHappy Mason vs Kristen Anderson2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesElka Wyse / Kelly Scully vs Allison Lewis / Angie Woltjen7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesAndrea Tuttle vs Erin Schreyer0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesCarmel Wood / Julie Dickson vs Margaret Shouse / Ellen Beren6-3, 6-0
2026-05-14vs Greenhill/Nevelow-Ewing W4.0TLost 13
L#1 DoublesKristen Budden / Erin Scannell vs Candice Ewing / Christine Drossos6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesHappy Mason vs Maria McGee1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMichelle Woodson / Elka Wyse vs Jean McAulay / Ann Schober2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 SinglesAndrea Tuttle vs Anne Bentley3-6, 5-7
L#1 DoublesErin Scannell / Michelle Woodson vs Jerilynn Fletcher / Claudia Villegas6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesHappy Mason vs Michele Beach4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesElka Wyse / Connie Ewing vs Lisa Lajous / Madeleine Rowe3-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesAndrea Tuttle vs Tina Kimbell5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2026-05-01vs High Point/Soldan W4.0TLost 14
W#1 DoublesMichelle Woodson / Erin Scannell vs Christine Keith / Katie Tran6-4, 6-2
L#1 SinglesHappy Mason vs Katherine Motlagh4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesLauren Sheaks / Elka Wyse vs Kristen Aragon / Valerie van Ausdall6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesAndrea Tuttle vs Maria Caldwell3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSharon Naukam / Anne Smith vs Amanda Craft / Taryn Ziehm7-6, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for S W. Thursday League have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Lauren Sheaks
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.82
Connie Ewing
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.81
Michelle Woodson
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.80
Julie Dickson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.78
Melanie Royer
published
3.70
Carmel Wood
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.67
Kelly Scully
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.62
Erin Scannell
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.56
Happy Mason
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.54
Lea Plamann
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.52
Sharon Naukam
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.48
Elka Wyse
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Kristi Barrientos
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.39
Joanie Buster
usually #1 Singles 44%, also #2 Singles 22% · published
3.38
Andrea Tuttle
usually #2 Singles 83%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 3.5
3.12
Barbara Donovan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Kristen Budden
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Woodson + Erin Scannell4355% games+10.7% vs expected
Connie Ewing + Julie Dickson6454% games+8.1% vs expected
Lauren Sheaks + Lea Plamann2360% games+5.0% vs expected
Erin Scannell + Elka Wyse4352% gamesnot enough data
Carmel Wood + Julie Dickson4159% gamesnot enough data
Barbara Donovan + Joanie Buster123 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Woodson + Elka Wyse033 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Woodson + Julie Dickson303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lauren Sheaks
6W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%74%25%
3.91
4
Connie Ewing
9W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.82
Michelle Woodson
10W–9L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
3.81
Julie Dickson
14W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.80
Melanie Royer
4W–3L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Carmel Wood
13W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.70
Kelly Scully
13W–11L career · 6 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.67
Erin Scannell
9W–11L career · 6 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.62
Happy Mason
9W–19L career · 6 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
3.56
Lea Plamann
9W–23L career · 4 lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
3.54
Sharon Naukam
2W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
3.52
Elka Wyse
7W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
55%45%<1%
3.48
Kristi Barrientos
7W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.40
Joanie Buster
24W–20L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Andrea Tuttle
5W–9L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%80%19%
3.38
3.5
Barbara Donovan
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.12
Kristen Budden
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.