Teams

Greenhill/Nevelow-Ewing W4.0T

2026 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & Over ADULT S · S W. Thursday League

19 players · average NTRP 3.94 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-06-12vs Kiest/Albus W4.0TLost 01
L#1 DoublesJulie Murray / Christine Drossos vs Bree Young / Heather Steele Curtis2-6, 6-7
2026-06-11Lost 01
L#1 SinglesKatie Talman vs Jerilynn Fletcher4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2026-05-28Won 10
W#1 SinglesKatie Talman vs Galia Goya7-5, 6-4
2026-05-26Lost 01
L#2 SinglesKatie Talman vs Laura Marroquin2-6, 2-6
2026-05-14vs Stonebriar/Woodson W4.0TSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCandice Ewing / Christine Drossos vs Kristen Budden / Erin Scannell4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMaria McGee vs Happy Mason6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2026-05-13Split 11
L#1 SinglesKatie Talman vs Kristen Anderson6-7, 0-6
W#2 SinglesMaria McGee vs Barbara Forkel3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-05-07Lost 01
L#1 SinglesKatie Talman vs Phine Kalonji2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for S W. Thursday League have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Elizabeth Nevelow
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 4
3.89
Monique Black
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.88
Kristen Lampe
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.86
Jean McAulay
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
3.84
Cindy Pappous
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.84
Julie Murray
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published
3.83
Jenna Xiong
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.82
Ann Schober
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.81
Brittani Yoo
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.79
Patricia Arvanitis
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.79
Candice Ewing
usually #1 Doubles 58%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
Christine Drossos
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.70
Gianine Claure
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.68
Maria McGee
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.64
Trish Chandler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.64
Melany White
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
Lani Trieu
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.30
Avari Garcia
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Katie Talman
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Murray + Candice Ewing5156% games+8.5% vs expected
Julie Murray + Elizabeth Nevelow20362% games+3.8% vs expected
Monique Black + Candice Ewing13554% games+3.6% vs expected
Monique Black + Elizabeth Nevelow17459% games+2.1% vs expected
Elizabeth Nevelow + Candice Ewing5355% games+1.9% vs expected
Patricia Arvanitis + Elizabeth Nevelow6452% games+1.8% vs expected
Jenna Xiong + Cindy Pappous11754% games−2.0% vs expected
Monique Black + Patricia Arvanitis6754% games−4.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Elizabeth Nevelow
67W–24L career · 11 lines in 2026
<1%76%23%
3.91
Monique Black
63W–27L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.89
Kristen Lampe
36W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.88
Jean McAulay
12W–21L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
3.86
4
Cindy Pappous
26W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%89%11%
3.84
Julie Murray
39W–9L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%89%10%
3.84
Jenna Xiong
36W–23L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Ann Schober
13W–20L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%91%9%
3.82
4
Brittani Yoo
21W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
3.81
Patricia Arvanitis
39W–25L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.79
4
Candice Ewing
46W–32L career · 12 lines in 2026
1%93%5%
3.79
4
Christine Drossos
1W–1L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
4
Gianine Claure
15W–8L career · 7 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.70
Maria McGee
23W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.68
Trish Chandler
14W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
14%86%<1%
3.64
Melany White
18W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
14%85%<1%
3.64
Lani Trieu
15W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
16%84%<1%
3.63
3.5
Avari Garcia
22W–35L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.30
Katie Talman
14W–16L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.