Teams

LOCH.Newsome

2026 CTRL Adult 55 & Over · Adult 55 & Over 3.5 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-04-12vs KF.HornbachLost 12
W#1 DoublesMike Gaul / Joseph Holsopple vs Kevin Fitzcharles / Randy Myers6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesTodd Bachman / Daryn Watson vs John Latzy / Stan Lucas2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJay Cutler / Patrick Vinson vs Stephane Daniel / Bryan Huggins1-6, 2-6
2026-03-29vs CAS.PedersenWon 30
W#1 DoublesDaniel Ford / Frank Bordonaro vs Morten Pedersen / Bradley Williford6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDavid Ferris / Charles Newsome vs Robert Johnson / Glenn Lycan6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesVincent Conzola / Todd Bachman vs Carlos Kim / Brian Seger6-4, 6-1
2026-03-22vs TOC.HorowitzWon 21
L#1 DoublesChristopher Wooten / Patrick Vinson vs James Lally / Dwarkesh Vakharia5-7, 5-7
W#2 DoublesFrank Bordonaro / Steven Miller vs Stephen Mcowen / Daniel Horowitz6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDavid Ferris / Joseph Holsopple vs Glen Hacker / Steve Pigora6-1, 6-3
2026-03-21vs NMAC.DanielWon 21
L#1 DoublesJay Cutler / Daryn Watson vs Mark Aycock / Daniel McDonald5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesFrank Bordonaro / Steven Miller vs Timothy Lage / Brian Hurley6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDavid Ferris / Charles Newsome vs Nicholas Broccolo / Taylor VICK6-2, 6-4
2026-03-08vs KF.HornbachLost 12
W#1 DoublesDaniel Ford / Mike Gaul vs John Latzy / Jim Smith6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesVincent Conzola / David Ferris vs Stephane Daniel / Bryan Huggins2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesTodd Bachman / Steven Miller vs Krassimir Kutlev / Randy Myers4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2026-03-01vs NMAC.DanielWon 30
W#1 DoublesDavid Ferris / Mike Gaul vs Mark Aycock / Daniel McDonald6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesFrank Bordonaro / Steven Miller vs Thomas Steet / Taylor VICK6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJay Cutler / Joseph Holsopple vs Bruce Adorian / Timothy Lage6-1, 6-1
2026-02-22vs CAS.PedersenWon 30
W#1 DoublesFrank Bordonaro / David Ferris vs Ivan Lacross / Glenn Lycan6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDaniel Ford / Mike Gaul vs Carlos Kim / Morten Pedersen6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDaryn Watson / Christopher Wooten vs Brian Seger / Bradley Williford6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2026-02-15vs TOC.HorowitzWon 30
W#1 DoublesSteven Miller / Frank Bordonaro vs Glen Hacker / Joe Francis6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesVincent Conzola / David Ferris vs Ariel Edery / Daniel Horowitz6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesTodd Bachman / Joseph Holsopple vs James Lally / Steve Pigora6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Adult 55 & Over 3.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LOCH.Newsome6218615158
2KF.Hornbach44131125184
3NMAC.Daniel2681635253

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
Mike Gaul
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.62
Frank Bordonaro
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.48
David Ferris
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.43
Daniel Ford
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.38
Vincent Conzola
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.29
Jay Cutler
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.28
Joseph Holsopple
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Christopher Wooten
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.25
Todd Bachman
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.11
Daryn Watson
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.08
Charles Newsome
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.04
Patrick Vinson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Vincent Conzola + David Ferris123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mike Gaul
4W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%15%85%
3.64
3.5
Frank Bordonaro
8W–0L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%17%83%
3.62
3.5
David Ferris
16W–9L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
3.48
Daniel Ford
6W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.43
3.5
Vincent Conzola
205W–133L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.38
Jay Cutler
3W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%93%5%
3.29
Joseph Holsopple
5W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Christopher Wooten
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Todd Bachman
7W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Daryn Watson
36W–80L career · 3 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.11
3.5
Charles Newsome
4W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
3.08
Patrick Vinson
40W–40L career · 2 lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
3.04

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.