Teams

KY/LEX/Gallagher-Ernst 55+

2026 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER LEXINGTON · 3.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.33 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-03-15vs KY/LEX/Bailey-MangoldLost 03
L#1 DoublesMarvetta Overstreet / Catherine McDoniel vs Susan Toth / Bridgett Barton2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesYvonne Conner / Rhonda Hilton vs Ann Boone / Shera Moulton1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMonica Mestanza / Diana Simpson vs Kavonne B. Webb / Susan Miller5-7, 0-1
2026-03-04vs KY/LEX/Begley-FakharpourSplit 11
L#2 DoublesMonica Mestanza / Lynn Schlumpf vs Lynn Littrell / Mary Diggins2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesMarvetta Overstreet / Catherine McDoniel vs Betty Grey / Mary Fakharpour6-1, 6-0
2026-02-27vs KY/LEX/SentersSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAmanda Ferguson / Lynn Schlumpf vs Cathy Corales / Kelly Moore0-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJennifer Ernst / Olive Gallagher vs Laura Kennoy / Margaret de Movellan6-4, 6-3
2026-02-23vs KY/LEX/Bailey-MangoldLost 03
L#1 DoublesOlive Gallagher / Marvetta Overstreet vs Carmen Amato / Katherine Hornback2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMonica Mestanza / Rhonda Hilton vs Bridgett Barton / Melissa Mangold1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKathy Robinson / Diana Simpson vs Ann Denny / Susan Miller2-6, 5-7
2026-02-15vs KY/LEX/Begley-FakharpourSplit 11
L#2 DoublesYvonne Conner / Sarah Hancock vs Emily Diehl / Monica Mullins2-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesJennifer Ernst / Olive Gallagher vs Sally Baker / Sally Kiel4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-02-08vs KY/LEX/Bailey-MangoldLost 03
L#1 DoublesMarvetta Overstreet / Heather Thompson vs Carmen Amato / Ann Denny3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesRegina Covington / Diana Simpson vs Nancy Bailey / Melissa Mangold1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRhonda Hilton / Kathy Robinson vs Debra Gevedon / Teela Watts4-6, 3-6
2026-02-01vs KY/LEX/SentersLost 12
W#1 DoublesAmanda Ferguson / Leslie Taylor vs Kelly Kubajak / Kelly Moore6-3, 0-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCatherine McDoniel / Kandi Waddles vs Doris Senters / Janine Coy6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSarah Hancock / Regina Covington vs Kenda Moore / Catherine Leslie3-6, 6-7
2026-01-23vs KY/LEX/Begley-FakharpourWon 20
W#2 DoublesLynn Schlumpf / Leslie Taylor vs Sienna Hooper / Monica Mullins4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesHeather Thompson / Amanda Ferguson vs Betty Grey / Robbie Doctrow6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2026-01-06vs KY/LEX/SentersLost 02
L#2 DoublesOlive Gallagher / Lynn Schlumpf vs Doris Senters / Kirsten van Haaren6-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesYvonne Conner / Marvetta Overstreet vs Linn Jefferson / Margaret de Movellan2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1KY/LEX/Bailey-Mangold812349154
2KY/LEX/Gallagher-Ernst 55+3681943288

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Catherine McDoniel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.29
Lynn Schlumpf
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.16
Olive Gallagher
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.15
Yvonne Conner
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
3.04
Amanda Ferguson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.98
Marvetta Overstreet
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
2.93
Regina Covington
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
2.83
Rhonda Hilton
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.78
Monica Mestanza
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.77
Diana Simpson
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.69
Kandi Waddles
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Diana Simpson + Regina Covington1538% games+1.9% vs expected
Regina Covington + Monica Mestanza134 matchesnot enough data
Marvetta Overstreet + Catherine McDoniel314 matchesnot enough data
Yvonne Conner + Olive Gallagher033 matchesnot enough data
Olive Gallagher + Rhonda Hilton123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Catherine McDoniel
16W–9L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%36%64%
3.55
Lynn Schlumpf
9W–8L career · 7 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.29
Olive Gallagher
13W–24L career · 6 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.16
Yvonne Conner
15W–36L career · 7 lines in 2026
14%86%1%
3.15
3.5
Amanda Ferguson
4W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
3.04
Marvetta Overstreet
11W–51L career · 8 lines in 2026
54%46%<1%
2.98
Regina Covington
16W–38L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
2.93
Rhonda Hilton
39W–48L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
Monica Mestanza
5W–32L career · 6 lines in 2026
94%6%<1%
2.78
3
Diana Simpson
6W–23L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
Kandi Waddles
3W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
9%89%1%
2.69

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.