Teams

CDTA S M55&O7.0 1.Wilm Mesh Sun 1 $20

1Summer Mixed 55&O WN · WE

18 players · average NTRP 3.42 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
W#1 DoublesJoseph Lyden / DANIELLE ARENDS vs Gregory Meyer / Linda Meyer7-6, 5-1
W#2 DoublesJohn Compton / Paula Grabow Duignan vs Beatrisa Paz / Mark Juhl7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLeo Kanev / Megan Crisham vs Howard Braun / Laurie Sandman1-6, 5-7
L#1 DoublesPaul Leonardo / Linda DeNardis vs Christina Greeley / Mark Juhl6-7, 3-6
L#1 DoublesJoseph Lyden / DANIELLE ARENDS vs Linda Meyer / Gregory Meyer4-6, 6-7
L#1 DoublesJohn Compton / DANIELLE ARENDS vs Julie Alexander / Mark Juhl7-6, 2-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPaul Leonardo / Linda DeNardis vs Laurie Sandman / Gregory Meyer6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesPaula Grabow Duignan / Nick Paterakos vs Paul Lesser / Rita Eichner6-2, 6-4
2026-06-14Won 10
W#2 DoublesDANIELLE ARENDS / Nick Paterakos vs Lisa Potash / Paul Lesser3-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · WE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S M55&O7.0 1.Wilm Mesh Sun 1 $206112926208
2CDTA S M55&O7.0 2.MTB Zusman Sun 12 $291691226193

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Becky Betts
published 4
3.64
Paul Leonardo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.43
Leo Kanev
published 3.5
3.39
Michael Denne
published 3.5
3.31
Joseph Lyden
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Paula Grabow Duignan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Andrew Pappas
published 3.5
3.25
Kathie Melean
published 3.5
3.22
Tina Dandridge
published 3.5
3.21
DANIELLE ARENDS
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.16
Megan Crisham
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.05
Steven Betts
published 3
3.03
Sarah W Johnson
published
3.00
Linda DeNardis
published 3
2.89
John Compton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.60
Alan Mesh
published 3
Jeric Johnson
published
Nick Paterakos
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrew Pappas + Kathie Melean231654% games+3.1% vs expected
Tina Dandridge + Michael Denne543556% games+1.3% vs expected
Becky Betts + Steven Betts42038% games−11.2% vs expected
Sarah W Johnson + Jeric Johnson3734% gamesnot enough data
Alan Mesh + Sarah W Johnson0626% gamesnot enough data
Paul Leonardo + Linda DeNardis224 matchesnot enough data
Joseph Lyden + DANIELLE ARENDS224 matchesnot enough data
Leo Kanev + Megan Crisham134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Becky Betts
7W–21L career · type S · no lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.79
Paul Leonardo
91W–64L career · 2 lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
3.64
3.5
Leo Kanev
198W–171L career · no lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.43
3.5
Michael Denne
157W–102L career · no lines in 2026
<1%80%19%
3.39
3.5
Joseph Lyden
66W–115L career · 1 line in 2026
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Paula Grabow Duignan
118W–82L career · 1 line in 2026
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Andrew Pappas
142W–94L career · no lines in 2026
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Kathie Melean
90W–82L career · no lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Tina Dandridge
108W–87L career · no lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
DANIELLE ARENDS
25W–37L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Megan Crisham
138W–161L career · 1 line in 2026
11%88%<1%
3.16
3
Steven Betts
8W–31L career · no lines in 2026
<1%34%66%
3.05
Sarah W Johnson
91W–135L career · no lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
3.03
3
Linda DeNardis
56W–30L career · no lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.00
John Compton
56W–88L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
2.89
3
Alan Mesh
51W–167L career · type A · no lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
2.60
Jeric Johnson
13W–19L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Nick Paterakos
93W–57L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.