Teams

X65 6.0 CV Oler

2025 NEOTA Mixed 65 & Over · NEOTA 6.0 65&O Mixed

15 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-10-25vs X65 6.0 TP FoxWon 21
L#1 DoublesMike Madden / Janet Davis vs William Fox / Gina Myers4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesSue Tseng Martin / Scott Martin vs Dennis Virdo / Janet Coon5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesWilliam Oler / Debora Bork vs Brian Moore / Laurie Fortune4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-10-19vs X65 6.0 TP FoxWon 30
W#1 DoublesTimothy Feller / Martina Roberts vs Janet Coon / George Welsh6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTim Allard / Janet Davis vs Gina Myers / Dennis Virdo6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesWilliam Oler / Debora Bork vs Brian Moore / Janel Ciolli6-1, 7-5
2025-10-11vs X65 6.0 TP FoxLost 12
L#1 DoublesSue Tseng Martin / Scott Martin vs Joie Matousek / Timothy Patterson4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKaren Lovejoy / Mike Madden vs Ronald Bassak / Patti Tschantz2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRichard Forsyth / Judith O'Hara vs William Farr / Susan Lowery-O'Connell3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-10-05vs X65 6.0 TP FoxLost 12
L#1 DoublesTim Allard / Janet Davis vs Gina Myers / William Fox2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesWilliam Oler / Sharon Prindle vs Joie Matousek / Timothy Patterson0-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJohn Lilly / Suzanne Herbener vs Ronald Bassak / Patti Tschantz6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2025-09-27vs X65 6.0 TP FoxWon 30
W#1 DoublesWilliam Oler / Sharon Prindle vs Susan Reese / Randy Reese6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKaren Lovejoy / Mike Madden vs Timothy Patterson / Laurie Fortune6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesMartina Roberts / Timothy Feller vs Susan Busch / Arthur Busch6-2, 6-3
2025-09-21vs X65 6.0 TP FoxWon 21
W#1 DoublesTim Allard / Janet Davis vs William Farr / Susan Lowery-O'Connell6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesWilliam Oler / Karen Lovejoy vs Susan Busch / Arthur Busch7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesScott Martin / Judith O'Hara vs George Welsh / Patti Tschantz3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · NEOTA 6.0 65&O Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1X65 6.0 CV Oler4212617158
2X65 6.0 TP Fox2461226180

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.15
Sharon Prindle
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.75
Karen Lovejoy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.49
Suzanne Herbener
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.38
Debora Bork
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Gary Zwick
published
Janet Davis
published
John Lilly
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Judith O'Hara
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Martina Roberts
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Mike Madden
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Sue Tseng Martin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Thomas Herbener
published
Tim Allard
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Timothy Feller
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
William Oler
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Debora Bork + William Oler314 matchesnot enough data
Thomas Herbener + Suzanne Herbener123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sharon Prindle
112W–147L career · 2 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.15
Karen Lovejoy
137W–133L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
Suzanne Herbener
12W–29L career · 1 line in 2025
53%47%<1%
2.49
3
Debora Bork
76W–100L career · 2 lines in 2025
80%20%<1%
2.38
Gary Zwick
32W–20L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Janet Davis
5W–13L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
John Lilly
59W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Judith O'Hara
19W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Martina Roberts
50W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mike Madden
7W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sue Tseng Martin
26W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Thomas Herbener
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tim Allard
64W–27L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Timothy Feller
11W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
William Oler
16W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.