Teams

BRTC:BRTC:Sets in the city:Brooks/Godfrin-Ruiz:Brooks/Godfri

2026 EMA Adult 40 & Over Women · 3.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 DoublesWendy Wills / Phoebe Ingram vs Kathleen Bass / Sharon Stearns1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesEmily Bourgette / Laetitia Godfrin-Ruiz vs Jennifer Wieckowski / Shirley Ciccolo6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2026-06-29vs MAC:MAC Attack:Cifric/OsterhoutLost 02
L#1 DoublesJennifer Brooks / Emily Bourgette vs Tricia Duncan / Erica Spencer2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMaria Fabbo / Tracy McLaughlin vs Carol McMahon / Gretchen Osterhout4-6, 3-6
2026-06-15vs NEW:Rackety Anns:Zizza/LynchLost 02
L#1 DoublesEmily Bourgette / Laetitia Godfrin-Ruiz vs Carrie Zizza / Devon Palermino2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKim Kochick / Ali Smith Kearney vs Sally Palen / Cindy Scally4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAli Smith Kearney / Phoebe Ingram vs Kathy Hocking / Nicole Ehrie6-7, 3-6
L#1 DoublesEmily Bourgette / Laetitia Godfrin-Ruiz vs Sharon Stearns / Emily Norton4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesTia Olivolo / Tracy McLaughlin vs Toni Cavallini / Jennifer Wieckowski1-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesRebecca Lawniczak / Maria Fabbo vs Shirley Ciccolo / Jacqueline Bolduc1-6, 6-2, 0-1
2026-05-11vs NEW:Rackety Anns:Zizza/LynchLost 02
L#1 DoublesEmily Bourgette / Laetitia Godfrin-Ruiz vs Devon Palermino / Carrie Zizza5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesTia Olivolo / Tracy McLaughlin vs Amanda Schroeder / Jennifer Yim0-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings26 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LFNT:Pink Ladies:Gould/Ingham0824821201
2NEW:Newburyport:Daley/Marsh08221024240
3LAK:Fine Whines:Bonito/Wallace08221024254
4ADI:Adirondack:Juszczyszyn/Perlman08191328280
5NASH:Nashawtuc:Kolloff/Carpenter08181429258
6WESF:Westfit Hot Flashes:Lee/Warren08201232267
7BBC:Brown Billone:Cuesta/Donovan08151736283
8SFT:Spark Blue:Koontz08141837291
9SFT:Spark-A: Green:Sideman/Sideman08161638297
10SFT:Spark Red:Klebe08151740296
11STC:Sportsmen's:Burke/Blacker08151741302
12CED:Summer Aces:Nugent08131942299
13LFW:Longfellow Longshots:Ackerley08112145317
14W109:Wimbledon:Hyams0892349328
15ACT:Acton Tennis:Fallon/Sullivan0872552340
16WOB:Netchix:Bojsen01033719253
17CED:Cedardale NTB:Cavallini/Chicoine010301028293
18NRHS:North Reading Green:Johnson010271330282
19BRTC:BRTC:Sets in the city:Brooks/Godfrin-Ruiz:Brooks/Godfri010281234314
20WSTC:Tennis Team:Ketterer010211947335
21BRTC:Bass River Red:Mancuso010182251381
22NEW:Rackety Anns:Zizza/Lynch010172353373
23SFT:"Hit Me With Your Best Shot":Hocking/Hodgdon010162453390
24BRTC:Smash and Sass:Stafford/Perel010152555410
25MAC:MAC Attack:Cifric/Osterhout010172358429
26BRTC:40 Love:Morris010122860412

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.74 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.92
Ryann Hilton
published
2.85
Emily Bourgette
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.82
Wendy Wills
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.80
2.79
Rebecca Lawniczak
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.79
Kim Kochick
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.68
Phoebe Ingram
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.67
Laetitia Godfrin-Ruiz
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.67
Camille Crawford
published 3
2.66
Ali Smith Kearney
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.64
Tracy McLaughlin
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.63
Tia Olivolo
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Maria Fabbo
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Adrienne Parrelli + Camille Crawford7457% games+6.0% vs expected
Laetitia Godfrin-Ruiz + Emily Bourgette7852% games+4.5% vs expected
Tracy McLaughlin + Tia Olivolo4945% games−2.6% vs expected
Kim Kochick + Emily Bourgette224 matchesnot enough data
Kim Kochick + Ali Smith Kearney224 matchesnot enough data
Tracy McLaughlin + Maria Fabbo123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ryann Hilton
11W–4L career · no lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
2.92
3
Emily Bourgette
23W–17L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%87%12%
2.85
Wendy Wills
6W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Adrienne Parrelli
22W–8L career · no lines in 2026
1%92%7%
2.80
Rebecca Lawniczak
7W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
1%93%5%
2.79
Kim Kochick
11W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
1%94%5%
2.79
Phoebe Ingram
5W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
9%91%1%
2.68
Laetitia Godfrin-Ruiz
16W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
10%90%1%
2.67
3
Camille Crawford
11W–6L career · no lines in 2026
10%89%1%
2.67
3
Ali Smith Kearney
8W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
11%89%<1%
2.66
Tracy McLaughlin
17W–31L career · 3 lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
2.64
Tia Olivolo
11W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
15%85%<1%
2.63
Maria Fabbo
16W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.