Teams

NASH:Nashawtuc:Kolloff/Carpenter

2026 EMA Adult 40 & Over Women · 3.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-20vs LFNT:Pink Ladies:Gould/InghamLost 13
W#1 DoublesMary Kolloff / Danielle Meade vs Magdalena Fookson / Helen Rennie7-6, 4-2
L#1 SinglesKristen Heintz-perkins vs Ann Fievet4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Schannault / Elaine Burke vs Sophie Broderick / Michelle Gibbs4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJoanna Wu / Julie Walker vs Maria Conroy / Janice Gould3-6, 2-6
2026-07-13vs LFW:Longfellow Longshots:AckerleyWon 31
W#1 DoublesSamantha Power / Elaine Burke vs Marsha Beatrice / Laura Helliwell6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesKristen Obrien vs Natalia Salkewicz3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesDanielle Meade / Julie Walker vs Claire Hu / Claudia Buser6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesTiffany Apczynski / Kristen Heintz-perkins vs Sharla Levine / Sarah Faucett7-6, 5-3
2026-06-29vs LFNT:Pink Ladies:Gould/InghamLost 12
L#1 DoublesMary Kolloff / Danielle Meade vs Jennifer Goldstein / Sophie Broderick6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKristen Obrien / Julie Walker vs Alison Dunn / Tissha Brumm6-4, 5-4
L#3 DoublesMargaret Flint / Kristen Heintz-perkins vs Dewi Nilamsari / Amparo Marks4-6, 6-5, 0-1
L#1 DoublesSamantha Power / Kristen Heintz-perkins vs Nina Lee / Erin Warren5-7, 5-7
L#1 SinglesKristen Obrien vs MJ Lanum4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMary Kolloff / Julie Walker vs Karen Dwyer / Sau Chen6-1, 7-5
L#3 DoublesDanielle Raja / Margaret Flint vs Melissa McMorrow / Ruhan Inanoglu3-6, 3-6
2026-06-15vs ACT:Acton Tennis:Fallon/SullivanSplit 22
L#1 DoublesMary Kolloff / Danielle Meade vs Sharon Reynolds / Vanessa Strong3-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesKristen Obrien vs Susan Baldwin6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJennifer Schannault / Kristen Heintz-perkins vs Emily Goldstein / Mimi Kirkman3-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesJoanna Wu / Samantha Power vs Linda Ahern / Annette Sullivan6-3, 6-2
2026-06-08vs LFW:Longfellow Longshots:AckerleyWon 31
W#1 DoublesElaine Burke / Julie Walker vs Claudia Buser / Jeanne Ackerley6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesSamantha Power vs Ebru Oral6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKristen Heintz-perkins / Tiffany Apczynski vs Isil Waxman / Laura Helliwell6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesKristen Obrien / Danielle Raja vs Claire Hu / Sharla Levine4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-05-11vs ACT:Acton Tennis:Fallon/SullivanWon 40
W#1 DoublesMary Kolloff / Danielle Meade vs Leslie Siciliano / Vanessa Strong6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesSamantha Power vs Susan Baldwin6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJennifer Schannault / Elaine Burke vs Mary Fallon / Mimi Kirkman7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesTiffany Apczynski / Joanna Wu vs Linda Ahern / Annette Sullivan6-1, 6-3
W#1 DoublesMary Kolloff / Danielle Meade vs Sau Chen / Maya Minkin6-1, 6-3
L#1 SinglesJoanna Wu vs MJ Lanum6-2, 0-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKristen Heintz-perkins / Jennifer Schannault vs Chihyi Lin / Karen Dwyer6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJulie Walker / Danielle Raja vs Ruhan Inanoglu / Amy Bell6-4, 4-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings26 teams · 3.0 Women
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.07
Samantha Power
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.92
Danielle Meade
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.89
Tiffany Apczynski
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.88
Elaine Burke
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.80
Kristen Heintz-perkins
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
2.77
Mary Kolloff
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
2.69
Joanna Wu
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.67
Kristen Obrien
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.61
Danielle Raja
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.48
Jennifer Schannault
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Margaret Flint
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Kolloff + Danielle Meade3257% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Samantha Power
4W–1L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%31%69%
3.07
3
Danielle Meade
4W–2L career · type S · 6 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
2.92
Tiffany Apczynski
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.89
Elaine Burke
3W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
2.88
Kristen Heintz-perkins
3W–4L career · 7 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
2.80
Mary Kolloff
4W–8L career · 6 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
Joanna Wu
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
2.69
Kristen Obrien
2W–3L career · 5 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
2.67
3
Danielle Raja
1W–2L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
22%77%<1%
2.61
Jennifer Schannault
10W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
57%43%<1%
2.48
Margaret Flint
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.