Teams

YOURS!

2024 USTA ADULT 18 and OVER - BOISE · TV

17 players · average NTRP 3.39 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2024-06-20vs Simply SmashingWon 21
W#1 DoublesNelda Denton / Julia Denton vs Gracie Franks / Kathy Deahl6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesJennifer Rawlinson vs Ashley Bryngelson6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLaurel Hancock / Jennifer Weldon vs Jennifer Rusk / Treva Pline4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-06-18vs Fireball!Won 20
W#2 DoublesNelda Denton / Julia Denton vs Alexandra Hodson / Cindy Biedebach6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesJennifer Rawlinson vs Lindsey Cassidy6-4, 6-3
2024-06-14Lost 02
L#2 DoublesNelda Denton / Julia Denton vs Tiffany Roberts / Cassie Ewing3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesFariss Mcgee / Laurel Hancock vs Katie Nelson / Alaina Sayers1-6, 0-6
2024-06-13vs Aloha BeachesLost 03
L#1 SinglesJennifer Rawlinson vs Kristin Bailey5-7, 0-6
L#2 SinglesDiana Gallinger vs Linda Bloomer0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJulia Denton / Laurel Hancock vs Michele Inghram / Alexa Bloomer2-6, 2-6
2024-06-11vs Each HitLost 03
L#1 DoublesMary Adcox / Laurel Hancock vs Zel Mertz / Terri Wippel1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesDiana Gallinger vs Katherine Bleth0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Rawlinson / Jennifer Weldon vs Marnie Newton / Kelly Loeb5-7, 2-6
2024-06-07Lost 01
L#1 SinglesJennifer Rawlinson vs Sonia Ivanova2-6, 1-6
2024-06-06vs Nothing but LoveWon 10
W#2 DoublesAngel Marie Bowie / Monica Reagan vs Lori Sato / Brenda Bourn4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-06-04Lost 02
L#1 DoublesNelda Denton / Angel Marie Bowie vs Dana Rusin / Jennifer Sukow2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesDiana Gallinger vs Mary Katayama0-6, 1-6
2024-05-28vs Messy Buns and GunsWon 20
W#1 DoublesAngel Marie Bowie / Monica Reagan vs Kristy Wong / Kristen Gray6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesJennifer Rawlinson vs Cassie Horner6-3, 6-2
2024-05-21Split 11
L#1 SinglesDiana Gallinger vs Amy Costello6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesJennifer Rawlinson vs Chynna Castoro6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for TV have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Dawn Crochet
published 3.5
3.37
Christina Elder
published 3.5
3.32
Julia Denton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.28
Mary Chodroff
published 3.5
3.28
Fariss Mcgee
published 3.5
3.17
Nelda Denton
published
3.14
Teresa Giamportone
published 3.5
3.06
Mary Adcox
published 3.5
3.05
Angel Marie Bowie
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.04
Monica Reagan
published
2.81
Jennifer Weldon
published 3
2.79
Diana Gallinger
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
2.68
Leah Hart
published
Jennifer Rawlinson
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #2 Singles 29% · published
Kelly Haskell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Laurel Hancock
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Lindsay Hemmer
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Monica Reagan + Dawn Crochet7553% games+2.7% vs expected
Fariss Mcgee + Dawn Crochet171452% games+0.1% vs expected
Nelda Denton + Julia Denton101050% games−0.9% vs expected
Mary Chodroff + Mary Adcox111646% games−1.9% vs expected
Angel Marie Bowie + Leah Hart61047% games−2.0% vs expected
Mary Adcox + Dawn Crochet4949% games−4.0% vs expected
Nelda Denton + Fariss Mcgee5746% games−5.5% vs expected
Leah Hart + Christina Elder3635% games−11.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dawn Crochet
163W–176L career · no lines in 2024
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Christina Elder
63W–71L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
3.37
Julia Denton
12W–11L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Mary Chodroff
115W–104L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Fariss Mcgee
79W–93L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
Nelda Denton
88W–106L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Teresa Giamportone
18W–29L career · no lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
3.14
3.5
Mary Adcox
150W–194L career · no lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
3.06
3.5
Angel Marie Bowie
24W–44L career · 3 lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
3.05
Monica Reagan
106W–95L career · no lines in 2024
38%61%<1%
3.04
3
Jennifer Weldon
9W–26L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Diana Gallinger
23W–31L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
2.79
Leah Hart
52W–93L career · no lines in 2024
99%1%<1%
2.68
Jennifer Rawlinson
11W–14L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data
Kelly Haskell
42W–84L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Laurel Hancock
9W–10L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Lindsay Hemmer
11W–19L career · 10 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.