Teams

Fireball!

2024 USTA ADULT 18 and OVER - BOISE · TV

22 players · average NTRP 3.65 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-07-02vs Nothing but LoveWon 10
W#2 DoublesBetsy McDonald / Cynthia Copple vs Erica Gibbons / Lynn Clanton6-4, 6-2
2024-06-27vs Messy Buns and GunsWon 20
W#1 DoublesPaige Gustavsen / Cynthia Copple vs Maureen Earl / Katelyn Carlock6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJennifer Johnson / Molly Schafer vs Cassie Horner / Kristy Wong6-3, 6-4
2024-06-20Won 10
W#3 DoublesPaige Gustavsen / Rebecca Fitzpatrick vs Jennifer Small / Kimberly Stewart6-3, 6-1
2024-06-18Won 10
W#1 DoublesSondra Power-Thornton / Betsy McDonald vs Dawn Crochet / Kelly Haskell6-1, 6-1
2024-06-13vs Simply SmashingWon 21
W#1 DoublesSondra Power-Thornton / Betsy McDonald vs Treva Pline / Karen Sheehan6-0, 6-1
L#1 SinglesJennifer Johnson vs Erica Laursen4-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesPaige Gustavsen vs KATIE RATLIFF7-6, 7-5
2024-06-06vs Aloha BeachesSplit 11
W#1 DoublesBetsy McDonald / Sondra Power-Thornton vs Ellen Kennedy / Stacie Hildebrandt6-4, 7-6
L#2 SinglesJennifer Johnson vs Kristin Bailey4-6, 3-6
2024-06-04Won 10
W#1 DoublesSondra Power-Thornton / Paige Gustavsen vs Terri Wippel / Zel Mertz6-3, 6-4
2024-05-28Won 10
W#2 DoublesPaige Gustavsen / Cynthia Copple vs Jennifer Sukow / Dana Rusin6-1, 7-6
2024-05-21vs Play It ForwardWon 20
W#1 DoublesJennifer Johnson / Molly Schafer vs Jen Hunter / Trudy Fouser5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCynthia Copple / Nancy Raeber vs Lina Zenner / Kari Forney1-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for TV have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Andrea Lambe
usually #1 Singles 78%, also #2 Singles 22% · published 4
3.71
Brooke Johnston
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.67
Alexandra Hodson
published 4
3.58
Angie Magnuson
published 4
3.52
3.42
Molly Schafer
published 3.5
3.42
Stacey Strong
published 3.5
3.35
Lindsey Cassidy
published 3.5
3.34
Amy Boettcher
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.26
Rebecca Fitzpatrick
published 3.5
3.26
Stephanie Churchman
published 3.5
3.25
Betsy McDonald
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.24
Andrea Reynolds
published 3.5
3.20
Cynthia Copple
published 3.5
3.19
Jennifer Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 25%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.14
Cindy Biedebach
published 3.5
3.02
Michelle Johnston
published 3.5
3.00
Emily Allen
published 3.5
Glory Questad
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 38% · published
Julie McDonald
published
Nancy Raeber
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Paige Gustavsen
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Johnston + Brooke Johnston14463% games+19.1% vs expected
Michelle Johnston + Rebecca Fitzpatrick7065% games+14.1% vs expected
Emily Allen + Angie Magnuson5461% games+13.3% vs expected
Betsy McDonald + Emily Allen12658% games+10.3% vs expected
Rebecca Fitzpatrick + Cindy Biedebach5353% games+3.8% vs expected
Stacey Strong + Emily Allen292854% games+1.9% vs expected
Rebecca Fitzpatrick + Stephanie Churchman141254% games+0.4% vs expected
Rebecca Fitzpatrick + Molly Schafer1742% games+0.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Andrea Lambe
43W–38L career · 9 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Brooke Johnston
20W–4L career · 6 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.71
4
Alexandra Hodson
155W–90L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.67
4
Angie Magnuson
112W–87L career · no lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
3.58
4
Sondra Power-Thornton
108W–90L career · no lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
3.52
3.5
Molly Schafer
87W–80L career · no lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
3.42
3.5
Stacey Strong
64W–62L career · no lines in 2024
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Lindsey Cassidy
111W–74L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%13%
3.35
3.5
Amy Boettcher
17W–20L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Rebecca Fitzpatrick
97W–114L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Stephanie Churchman
136W–91L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Betsy McDonald
52W–23L career · 4 lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Andrea Reynolds
84W–122L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Cynthia Copple
74W–96L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.20
Jennifer Johnson
28W–32L career · 4 lines in 2024
9%89%1%
3.19
3.5
Cindy Biedebach
54W–66L career · no lines in 2024
15%84%1%
3.14
3.5
Michelle Johnston
52W–16L career · no lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
3.02
3.5
Emily Allen
82W–69L career · no lines in 2024
51%49%<1%
3.00
Glory Questad
43W–59L career · 8 lines in 2024
not enough data
Julie McDonald
18W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Nancy Raeber
22W–8L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Paige Gustavsen
27W–17L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.