Teams

Tuplano/Ostlund TBC 40+ 4.0 S24

2024 ADULT 40 & OVER SUMMER · 4.0 Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.90 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-07-18vs Schoenecker - ChaseLost 01
L#1 DoublesRamon Villanueva / CRAIG STERN vs Joseph Millard / Phillip Chase0-6, 0-6
2024-06-20vs Jilek/Elfstrum Summer 40+Lost 01
L#3 DoublesRick Johnston / CRAIG STERN vs Jason Ostrowski / Curt Hedin0-6, 2-6
2024-06-06vs Duwearatchi/Ballentine 40+ SummerLost 01
L#4 DoublesPer Ostlund / CRAIG STERN vs Jesse Radabaugh / Chandha Duwearatchi2-6, 1-6
2024-05-30Won 10
W#3 DoublesRick Johnston / CRAIG STERN vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Julian Bannach
published
3.80
Senan Kelly
published
3.79
Ramon Villanueva
published
3.79
Brett Pauley
published 4
3.75
Bhavin Trivedi
published 4
3.74
Paul Jackson
published
3.67
Steven Swanberg
published
3.66
CRAIG STERN
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.57
Per Ostlund
published
3.52
Rick Johnston
published
3.28
Chuck Rudie
published 3.5
3.24
Jov Tuplano
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ramon Villanueva + Julian Bannach10951% games−1.5% vs expected
Bhavin Trivedi + Paul Jackson1446% games−4.5% vs expected
Per Ostlund + Paul Jackson033 matchesnot enough data
Julian Bannach + Senan Kelly123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julian Bannach
33W–18L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%14%
3.85
Senan Kelly
19W–15L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.80
Ramon Villanueva
38W–26L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Brett Pauley
25W–18L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.79
4
Anantha Santhanam
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Bhavin Trivedi
17W–15L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.75
Paul Jackson
10W–17L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.74
Steven Swanberg
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.67
4
CRAIG STERN
131W–164L career · 4 lines in 2024
13%86%1%
3.66
Per Ostlund
14W–42L career · no lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.57
Rick Johnston
37W–29L career · no lines in 2024
<1%44%56%
3.52
3.5
Chuck Rudie
5W–4L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
Jov Tuplano
24W–22L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.24

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.