Teams

BC-AltaVista/LynetteCampbell

2021 SCTA DOUBLES - Beach Cities · BC Women - 4.0

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#2 DoublesNoriko Hongo / Riho Nakano vs Lisa Hawk / Rika Tanous6-7, 4-6
2021-11-21vs BC-MCC/RachelAlexanderWon 10
W#1 DoublesAngelica Galvez-Deutsch / Lisa Inomata-O'Connell vs Annie Han / Amy Karr6-1, 7-6
2021-11-14vs BC-MCC/JulieWattsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesNancy Maeda / Riho Nakano vs Lindsay Ashcraft / Drisa Carrizo1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesIngrid Flintoft / Jennifer Mann vs Kelly Robson / JoAnn Totzke7-5, 5-7, 1-0
2021-11-07vs BC-LLW-AltaVista/MaryRoseKalemLost 01
L#1 DoublesAngelica Galvez-Deutsch / Lisa Inomata-O'Connell vs Xiaozhen Yuan / Margaret Gray3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2021-10-24Won 10
W#1 DoublesAngelica Galvez-Deutsch / Lisa Inomata-O'Connell vs Leslie Royles / Wendy Moskowitz7-5, 7-6
2021-10-17Won 10
W#1 DoublesNancy Maeda / Riho Nakano vs Charmaine Cosky / Barbara Oliker6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2021-10-03vs BC-WestEnd/ForrestBleakleySplit 11
L#2 DoublesIngrid Flintoft / Jennifer Mann vs Kay C Johnson / Denise Vega5-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesSanghee Kim / Angelica Galvez-Deutsch vs Betsy Dobson / Sayaka Amano6-2, 6-4
2021-09-19vs BC-WestEnd/CherylUnreinWon 10
W#2 DoublesNancy Maeda / Riho Nakano vs Lauran Jacks / Susan Neal6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for BC Women - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Angelica Galvez-Deutsch
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.84
3.76
Riho Nakano
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.74
Aki Takeda
published 4
3.73
Carol Ecker
published 4
3.65
Shubha Chick
published
3.57
Ingrid Flintoft
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.23
Mukti Patel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Miki Heinonen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Riho Nakano + Angelica Galvez-Deutsch213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Angelica Galvez-Deutsch
135W–95L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%57%43%
3.98
Lisa Inomata-O'Connell
10W–6L career · no lines in 2021
<1%89%11%
3.84
4
Riho Nakano
92W–67L career · 4 lines in 2021
2%95%3%
3.76
4
Aki Takeda
4W–2L career · no lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Carol Ecker
13W–11L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.73
Shubha Chick
2W–8L career · no lines in 2021
13%87%<1%
3.65
4
Ingrid Flintoft
91W–68L career · 2 lines in 2021
29%71%<1%
3.57
Mukti Patel
24W–22L career · 1 line in 2021
4%94%2%
3.23
Miki Heinonen
5W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.