Teams

BC-PalosVerdesTC/GalenaMiller-Horii

2021 SCTA DOUBLES - Beach Cities · BC Women - 4.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.75 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-12-05vs BC-AltaVista/LynetteCampbellWon 10
W#2 DoublesLisa Hawk / Rika Tanous vs Noriko Hongo / Riho Nakano7-6, 6-4
2021-11-14vs BC-MCC/RachelAlexanderWon 10
W#2 DoublesEiko Bacich / Leslie Winston vs Amy Karr / Marci Beech4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2021-10-24vs BC-LLW-AltaVista/MaryRoseKalemLost 02
L#1 DoublesRandi Young / Venita McLay vs Nachi Smith / Juli Vadney6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRika Tanous / Lisa Hawk vs Yumi Yamamoto / Xiaozhen Yuan3-6, 3-6
2021-10-03vs BC-Kramer/SophieSokolowLost 01
L#1 DoublesRandi Young / Nikki Nance vs Melanie Archer / Sophie Sokolow3-6, 6-7
2021-09-26vs BC-WestEnd/ForrestBleakleyWon 10
W#1 DoublesNikki Nance / Stephanie Guggenheim vs Christeen Field / Denise Vega6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2021-09-19vs BC-MCC/ChristineBucklinWon 10
W#3 DoublesAbigail Puccinelli / Rika Tanous vs Christa Givich / Kari Carpino6-1, 7-5
2021-09-12vs BC-WestEnd/CherylUnreinLost 02
L#1 DoublesRandi Young / Teena Wapner vs Ahdeyh Soltani / Kathleen Callahan6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLeslie Winston / Deirdre Hunt vs Jennifer Chung / Madeline Evans4-6, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for BC Women - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Stephanie Guggenheim
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.84
3.53
Lisa Hawk
published
3.50
Venita McLay
published
3.49
Michelle Rosen
published
3.42
Teena Wapner
published
3.32
Rika Tanous
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.95
Leslie Winston
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Jacqueline Geiger
published
Nikki Nance
published
Randi Young
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Stephanie Guggenheim
67W–59L career · 1 line in 2021
<1%84%15%
3.87
4
Galena Miller-Horii
5W–1L career · no lines in 2021
<1%89%10%
3.84
Lisa Hawk
2W–3L career · no lines in 2021
<1%42%58%
3.53
Venita McLay
1W–2L career · no lines in 2021
48%52%<1%
3.50
Michelle Rosen
1W–2L career · no lines in 2021
52%48%<1%
3.49
Teena Wapner
5W–4L career · no lines in 2021
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Rika Tanous
128W–103L career · 3 lines in 2021
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Leslie Winston
47W–104L career · 2 lines in 2021
65%35%<1%
2.95
Jacqueline Geiger
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Nikki Nance
7W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Randi Young
46W–65L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.