Teams

SD 7.0 Lake Murray TC/ Snyder

2026 Adult 55 & Over Spring · Summer- SD

10 players · average NTRP 3.40 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-07-30vs WC SD 7.0 Peninsula TC/ RandquistSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMichelle Simpson / Kristen Miller vs Patricia Brennan / Pam Trent6-4, 7-6
L#3 DoublesJoy Spencer / Lyn Crisologo vs Daren Hillebrandt / Shelly Patriquin3-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesMichelle Simpson / Colleen Hartman vs Herta Ixtlahuac / Lilyan Ruiz1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKristen Miller / Dina Gilbertson vs Celia Hernandez / Irene Roberts4-6, 6-7
2026-07-16vs SD 7.0 SDTRC/ PeinadoWon 21
L#1 DoublesColleen Hartman / Peggy Peloquin vs Jackie Niddrie / Lindy Mamer3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKristen Miller / Dina Gilbertson vs Nancy Stevens / Maren Outwater6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJoy Spencer / Lynne Carry vs Paula Colarusso / Jennie Blacker4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2026-07-09vs SD 7.0 Coronado TC/ HolzerLost 02
L#1 DoublesColleen Hartman / Michelle Simpson vs Sue Taylor / Christine Johnson5-7, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJoy Spencer / Lyn Crisologo vs Leslie Vineyard / Diana Kirkland2-6, 1-6
2026-07-02vs SD 7.0 Mountain View/ PadillaSplit 11
L#1 DoublesPeggy Peloquin / Amy Snyder vs Ruby Gardner / Ana Hernandez3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesMichelle Simpson / Colleen Hartman vs Debbie Nowakowski / Elizabeth Jimenez6-3, 6-4
2026-06-25vs WC SD 7.0 Peninsula TC/ RandquistLost 03
L#1 DoublesPeggy Peloquin / Kelli Sandman-Hurley vs Patricia Brennan / Pam Trent5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKristen Miller / Dina Gilbertson vs Dana Davalos / Lisa Mallory2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLynne Carry / Lyn Crisologo vs Daren Hillebrandt / Tracy Wilkinson0-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesColleen Hartman / Michelle Simpson vs Rosie Wagner / Irene Roberts2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesKelli Sandman-Hurley / Peggy Peloquin vs Lilyan Ruiz / Herta Ixtlahuac2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesKristen Miller / Amy Snyder vs Kathie Angione / Deborah Fitzgerald0-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-06-11vs SD 7.0 Coronado TC/ HolzerLost 02
L#1 DoublesMichelle Simpson / Kristen Miller vs Diana Elia / Elizabeth Dahlgren2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesLyn Crisologo / Amy Snyder vs Maria Simon / Sheryl Putnam6-7, 4-6
2026-06-04vs SD 7.0 SDTRC/ PeinadoLost 02
L#1 DoublesPeggy Peloquin / Kristen Miller vs Liliana Abbott / Lindy Mamer2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesCarla Fox / Amy Snyder vs Margaret Amaral / Nancy Stevens6-7, 4-6
2026-05-28vs SD 7.0 Mountain View/ PadillaLost 03
L#1 DoublesKelli Sandman-Hurley / Peggy Peloquin vs Ana Hernandez / Elizabeth Jimenez6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMichelle Simpson / Kristen Miller vs Bea Vega / Cecilia Paredes-lopez7-5, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLyn Crisologo / Carla Fox vs Aida Padilla / Tenley Gritts1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · Summer- SD
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SD LLW WD 7.0 Mountain View/ Roberts8224619208
2SD 7.0 Coronado TC/ Holzer73181228265
3SD 7.0 Mountain View/ Padilla55131740302
4SD 7.0 SDTRC/ Peinado1972348332
5SD 7.0 Lake Murray TC/ Snyder1962450340

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
Colleen Hartman
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.16
Dina Gilbertson
published 3.5
2.95
Carla Fox
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.92
2.88
Lynne Carry
published 3
Joy Spencer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kristen Miller
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
Lyn Crisologo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Michelle Simpson
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Peggy Peloquin
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelli Sandman-Hurley + Peggy Peloquin0631% gamesnot enough data
Dina Gilbertson + Kristen Miller2446% gamesnot enough data
Michelle Simpson + Colleen Hartman134 matchesnot enough data
Kristen Miller + Michelle Simpson123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Colleen Hartman
1W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Dina Gilbertson
1W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.16
3.5
Carla Fox
1W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
64%36%<1%
2.95
3.5
Kelli Sandman-Hurley
3W–15L career · no lines in 2026
72%28%<1%
2.92
3
Lynne Carry
7W–9L career · no lines in 2026
<1%80%19%
2.88
Joy Spencer
1W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kristen Miller
5W–6L career · 8 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lyn Crisologo
0W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Michelle Simpson
2W–7L career · 7 lines in 2026
not enough data
Peggy Peloquin
0W–6L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.